35
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] sanitation@lemmy.today 19 points 13 hours ago
[-] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I wonder how viable it would be to do the opposite of quantum. If we remove every at risk feature and strip it down to the basics: no scripts, no multi-user, no public sharing etc...

Project could be pretty easy to maintain indefinitely?

[-] jello@programming.dev 5 points 10 hours ago

I've tried to use quantum and it lost the "just works" factor that OG filebrowser has. Not sure what I'll do now

[-] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Really? I never tried the original but didn’t have much problems setting up quantum. I had to modify my caddy file somewhat to suite my needs, but just works now.

[-] jello@programming.dev 1 points 46 minutes ago

Did you make any modifications for large file uploads? My main problem was that big files (As in 5GB) would fail.

[-] irmadlad@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Thanks for that. I grinned at the pitch; 'It’s a no-compromise solution that’s a a quantum leap forward. Looking at the rest of the page, it does seem to have some bases covered with features. So, naturally, I'm going to have to check it out. Bookmarked.

[-] irmadlad@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

I couldn't find any reason they're winding down. I wonder why? Was this planned? Battlefield Fatigue? I've used it before, had no real complaints. It fit the use case at the time.

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 5 points 4 hours ago

It's there on the readme: https://hacdias.com/2026/07/28/filebrowser/

The project needs a rewrite from scratch, but the author had enough.

[-] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

I remember reading earlier this year that the project was essentially "complete" and would only get security updates.

But like he says: "people keep making PRs for new features. Features that I do really think would benefit the project."

I really struggle with folks' sense of gratitude sometimes. Like there's so many people making cool things for us... for free... When they could be doing the same work for money.

But yeah, sucks nobody could really keep the project up and secure. I'm not looking for a fork that will add anything to the project.

I'll read some of the bug tickets to see what the current state is like. Figured this thing could just work indefinitely without much maintenance... its so simple?

[-] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

This is 100% off topic but I just realised username is ”I R mad lad” and not ”Irma Dlad”.

[-] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That's funny.

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 2 points 4 hours ago

I read "I R Madlad" in the style of "I R Baboon".

[-] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Actually, you have discovered my origin story.

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
35 points (94.9% liked)

Selfhosted

60967 readers
602 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS