Arizona recorded the largest drop in enrollment after the bill became law. The legislation tightened eligibility rules for food assistance and increased state screening requirements. State data through May shows that more than 450,000 Arizonans have come off Snap, cutting overall participation within the state in half.

According to the CBPP analysis, children make up a significant portion of those losing benefits, with more than 1 million children across the 19 states studied no longer receiving Snap assistance.

In Louisiana, nearly one in four children receiving Snap benefits lost assistance. Massachusetts and Texas each saw close to one-fifth of children enrolled in the program removed from Snap.

And further below, the cause for the suffering of children:

The report says the steep decline in participation is likely tied in large part to the 2025 Republican reconciliation law, also known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which shifted a substantial share of Snap benefit costs to states based on their payment error rates.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 78 points 2 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 39 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    They aren't pro life, just pro birth

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    If we can't even feed the children, how are we worthy as a nation?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    food chain keeping some poor neighborhoods from being food deserts are closing down in my city. operator said when the snap cuts hit so did their monthly (no duh) and they can't cover monthly costs.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago*

    SNAP is a subsidy to the poor and to farmers.

    Insofar as it benefits farmers, it's obviously a rural benefit, and it's also advantageous to rural areas on the poor front.

    https://frac.org/blog/snaps-critical-role-in-rural-communities-and-the-consequences-of-cuts

    One in seven rural households relies on SNAP, compared to one in eight in metropolitan areas. 

    If were a rural Republican voter and the "rural party" had just gotten a trifecta and promptly proceeded to do this


    like, this is theoretically as good as it gets


    I'd probably be a little grouchy.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (47 children)

    Food "benefit". 🤡
    Americans are such clowns in their rhetoric. Everything gets twisted.
    Food is not a "benefit".

  • source
  • hideshow 47 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    "Benefit" is one of the less inflammatory descriptions. Republicans typically demonize these programs by referring to them as 'entitlements'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    The word "entitlement" is one that the cons have loved to weaponize - they make it sound like the people getting entitlements are entitled little brats (or welfare queens, as Ronnie Raygun put it), when it's about the legal framework of those programs.

    They love to twist language - see their use of the word "elite" as another great example. People with ungodly amounts of money don't count as elite in their view, but someone that cracks open a book is an elite.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (45 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    If the Pedo Party can't fuck kids, they'll starve them. Sounds on brand for those sickos.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    If you can, donate to your local food bank. We all need to help each other.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    So the bill is working as intended and a 'success' then?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    I think they call this the "Just-world fallacy". The theory being that the poor are poor for a reason, usually their own incompetence or stupidity. And anyone who does possess resources has them because they worked hard and are smart and awesome.

    This powers an empathy gap, where the more resources you accrue, the less you feel related to the people around you.

    I dont know if its capitalism or basic human nature, but it sure is sad and unjust.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›