I can’t quite get over the fact that the premise is false

Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes.

Bismuth has joined the chat

Most scientists won't say that there are no straight lines in nature, it's so obviously and provably wrong. I think it's more of a thing philosophically said when talking about how modern life is so different and unnatural compared to the lives of ancient people or animals.

Straight line and sharp corners in almost all crystals.

Nice eg. in Ireland

just because someone calls themself a scientist doesnt mean they are, as evidenced by that post

And this is why absolute statements are generally bad arguments. It only takes one example to disprove them.

Wildcats are nature, they have multiple very sharp corners.

Quite ironic.

Does it still have straight lines under a microscope?

Does it still have straight lines if you look really closely?

I must confess, this sparked a laugh

This pointiness, it’s nature’s gaff

Give me a siiiiign

Fool me baby one more time

well done OP, you really stuck it to those stupid scientists

/s

Technically fibers in wood is straight.

I want to say ice has straight edges

We exist within nature, so nature created linear particle accelerators.