▲ 918 ▼ I must con(FeS₂), this sparked a laugh (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 months ago by cannedtuna@lemmy.world to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 112 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MohamedMoney@feddit.org 92 points 3 months ago (45 children) I can’t quite get over the fact that the premise is false permalink fedilink source hideshow 45 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 74 points 3 months ago (41 children) no science teacher would ever say that. Light travels in a straight line, plenty of crystals, linear erosion, many trees evolved to be as straight as possible... and to be esoteric, every object path, even when gravity affects them (they travel in a perfectly straight line, but it is spacetime that is curved). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 41 child comments replies: [+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (25 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 25 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (10 children) they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though. space time is curved, not the light path. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) What about the fact that light bends around corners? Notably the interference pattern when shining light through a slit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Stop being mean to light by making it choose what slits to go through. it has choice anxiety. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) Ah, sorry for the confusion, I was referring to the single-slit experiment, I wasn't giving light a choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago that's worse :( let light be free permalink fedilink source parent [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children) I don’t think that’s right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Maldreamer@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (2 children) But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago "through vacuum" permalink fedilink source parent [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (1 child) gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself. light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight. like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium. Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct than Newtonian gravity). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago Makes sense to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent [–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago Only a Sith! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@piefed.world 3 points 3 months ago In that case that Pyrite proves nothing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (9 children) It travels in a straight line, just not in every dimension. Look at a waveform from above, it's a straight line. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (3 children) Uh... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Oh sure, bring evidence into it 🙄 lol. Um, how about sound waves? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Sound waves are compressive waves, they radiate spherically (in principle, turbulence in the medium is going to make them slightly irregular) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Neat! permalink fedilink source parent [–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) that's just silly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children) Is it inaccurate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago plain wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago Apparently it is permalink fedilink source parent [–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago But photons are also particles. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 3 months ago Photons are both particles and waves, not only waves (that's because of the wave-particle duality discovered by/after Einstein's theories). permalink fedilink source parent [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (11 children) We can say that spatially, the summation of the photons movement is linear, but everything in the universe is waves and curves and we all know that to be true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (10 children) if by straight you mean a perfect eucledian line, then there's no such thing as a perfect line in nature or reality. as that might violate the Eisenberg Uncertainty principle. because if I know two points position or or if I know the direction and one point I'll know the position and direction of every point. but then that's too esoteric. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (6 children) You are clearly full of shit and have no idea what you're talking about, and your flip-flopping between positions permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (5 children) it's a meme channel, it's a stupid question, you get stupid answers. I'm not putting my name in a paper saying definitely of straight exist in nature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) If straight didn't exist in nature, it would just be gays and nothing would ever procreate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Heterosexuality is extremely rare in nature, mose animals have a lot of gay going on. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Krudler@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) Counterpoint: shut the fuck up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) you literally have the power to shut people up at will, just block em, faster and more effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago You earned it. If you were even remotely funny or clever or had anything to say I wouldn't but you're a jackass. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Your username has a typo in it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Don't do drugs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago Wayyy to late partner permalink fedilink source parent [–] fartographer@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (2 children) I work in public education. That's a pretty innocuous statement compared to some of the shit I've heard. Some teachers get so complacent in their lessons that they forget to apply it in their critical-thinking. Then, they have some crazy logical lapse, say something ridiculous out loud, and then some other kid from that class repeats that same shit to their own students when they grow up. These are mistakes that could easily be rectified with an apology or deliberate correction, but teachers are pushed so hard to prioritize being an authority figure that they sometimes forget to just be a teacher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) I'm going to pull a no true Scotsman, no good teacher would say that. yhea, there are teachers that lose it a bit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago You'll hear no arguments from me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago Memes like this are so dumb. Laugh tracks for the internet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago It's useful as a navigational aid, if you're lost in the woods keeping an eye open for straight lines, especially horizontal, is a good way of finding man made structures and potentially a way out. Beyond that, on a micro scale nature loves perfect geometry. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago Yeah, it's a very stupid concept made into a very stupid meme to make dumb people feel dopamine over the concept of scientists being allegedly dumber than them. I really hate our species sometimes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 74 points 3 months ago (41 children) no science teacher would ever say that. Light travels in a straight line, plenty of crystals, linear erosion, many trees evolved to be as straight as possible... and to be esoteric, every object path, even when gravity affects them (they travel in a perfectly straight line, but it is spacetime that is curved). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 41 child comments replies: [+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (25 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 25 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (10 children) they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though. space time is curved, not the light path. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) What about the fact that light bends around corners? Notably the interference pattern when shining light through a slit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Stop being mean to light by making it choose what slits to go through. it has choice anxiety. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) Ah, sorry for the confusion, I was referring to the single-slit experiment, I wasn't giving light a choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago that's worse :( let light be free permalink fedilink source parent [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children) I don’t think that’s right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Maldreamer@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (2 children) But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago "through vacuum" permalink fedilink source parent [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (1 child) gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself. light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight. like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium. Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct than Newtonian gravity). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago Makes sense to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent [–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago Only a Sith! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@piefed.world 3 points 3 months ago In that case that Pyrite proves nothing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (9 children) It travels in a straight line, just not in every dimension. Look at a waveform from above, it's a straight line. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (3 children) Uh... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Oh sure, bring evidence into it 🙄 lol. Um, how about sound waves? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Sound waves are compressive waves, they radiate spherically (in principle, turbulence in the medium is going to make them slightly irregular) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Neat! permalink fedilink source parent [–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) that's just silly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children) Is it inaccurate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago plain wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago Apparently it is permalink fedilink source parent [–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago But photons are also particles. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 3 months ago Photons are both particles and waves, not only waves (that's because of the wave-particle duality discovered by/after Einstein's theories). permalink fedilink source parent [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (11 children) We can say that spatially, the summation of the photons movement is linear, but everything in the universe is waves and curves and we all know that to be true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (10 children) if by straight you mean a perfect eucledian line, then there's no such thing as a perfect line in nature or reality. as that might violate the Eisenberg Uncertainty principle. because if I know two points position or or if I know the direction and one point I'll know the position and direction of every point. but then that's too esoteric. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (6 children) You are clearly full of shit and have no idea what you're talking about, and your flip-flopping between positions permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (5 children) it's a meme channel, it's a stupid question, you get stupid answers. I'm not putting my name in a paper saying definitely of straight exist in nature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) If straight didn't exist in nature, it would just be gays and nothing would ever procreate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Heterosexuality is extremely rare in nature, mose animals have a lot of gay going on. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Krudler@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) Counterpoint: shut the fuck up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) you literally have the power to shut people up at will, just block em, faster and more effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago You earned it. If you were even remotely funny or clever or had anything to say I wouldn't but you're a jackass. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Your username has a typo in it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Don't do drugs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago Wayyy to late partner permalink fedilink source parent [–] fartographer@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (2 children) I work in public education. That's a pretty innocuous statement compared to some of the shit I've heard. Some teachers get so complacent in their lessons that they forget to apply it in their critical-thinking. Then, they have some crazy logical lapse, say something ridiculous out loud, and then some other kid from that class repeats that same shit to their own students when they grow up. These are mistakes that could easily be rectified with an apology or deliberate correction, but teachers are pushed so hard to prioritize being an authority figure that they sometimes forget to just be a teacher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) I'm going to pull a no true Scotsman, no good teacher would say that. yhea, there are teachers that lose it a bit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago You'll hear no arguments from me. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (25 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 25 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (10 children) they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though. space time is curved, not the light path. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) What about the fact that light bends around corners? Notably the interference pattern when shining light through a slit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Stop being mean to light by making it choose what slits to go through. it has choice anxiety. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) Ah, sorry for the confusion, I was referring to the single-slit experiment, I wasn't giving light a choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago that's worse :( let light be free permalink fedilink source parent [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children) I don’t think that’s right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Maldreamer@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (2 children) But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago "through vacuum" permalink fedilink source parent [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (1 child) gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself. light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight. like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium. Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct than Newtonian gravity). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago Makes sense to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent [–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago Only a Sith! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@piefed.world 3 points 3 months ago In that case that Pyrite proves nothing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (9 children) It travels in a straight line, just not in every dimension. Look at a waveform from above, it's a straight line. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (3 children) Uh... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Oh sure, bring evidence into it 🙄 lol. Um, how about sound waves? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Sound waves are compressive waves, they radiate spherically (in principle, turbulence in the medium is going to make them slightly irregular) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Neat! permalink fedilink source parent [–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) that's just silly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children) Is it inaccurate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago plain wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago Apparently it is permalink fedilink source parent [–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago But photons are also particles. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 3 months ago Photons are both particles and waves, not only waves (that's because of the wave-particle duality discovered by/after Einstein's theories). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (10 children) they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though. space time is curved, not the light path. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) What about the fact that light bends around corners? Notably the interference pattern when shining light through a slit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Stop being mean to light by making it choose what slits to go through. it has choice anxiety. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) Ah, sorry for the confusion, I was referring to the single-slit experiment, I wasn't giving light a choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago that's worse :( let light be free permalink fedilink source parent [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children) I don’t think that’s right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Maldreamer@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (2 children) But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago "through vacuum" permalink fedilink source parent [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (1 child) gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself. light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight. like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium. Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct than Newtonian gravity). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago Makes sense to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) What about the fact that light bends around corners? Notably the interference pattern when shining light through a slit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Stop being mean to light by making it choose what slits to go through. it has choice anxiety. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) Ah, sorry for the confusion, I was referring to the single-slit experiment, I wasn't giving light a choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago that's worse :( let light be free permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Stop being mean to light by making it choose what slits to go through. it has choice anxiety. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) Ah, sorry for the confusion, I was referring to the single-slit experiment, I wasn't giving light a choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago that's worse :( let light be free permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) Ah, sorry for the confusion, I was referring to the single-slit experiment, I wasn't giving light a choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago that's worse :( let light be free permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago that's worse :( let light be free permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children) I don’t think that’s right because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Maldreamer@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (2 children) But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago "through vacuum" permalink fedilink source parent [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (1 child) gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself. light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight. like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium. Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct than Newtonian gravity). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago Makes sense to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maldreamer@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (2 children) But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago "through vacuum" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago "through vacuum" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago "through vacuum" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (1 child) gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself. light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight. like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium. Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct than Newtonian gravity). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago Makes sense to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago Makes sense to me. Thanks permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Klear@piefed.world 3 points 3 months ago In that case that Pyrite proves nothing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (9 children) It travels in a straight line, just not in every dimension. Look at a waveform from above, it's a straight line. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (3 children) Uh... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Oh sure, bring evidence into it 🙄 lol. Um, how about sound waves? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Sound waves are compressive waves, they radiate spherically (in principle, turbulence in the medium is going to make them slightly irregular) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Neat! permalink fedilink source parent [–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) that's just silly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children) Is it inaccurate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago plain wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago Apparently it is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (3 children) Uh... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Oh sure, bring evidence into it 🙄 lol. Um, how about sound waves? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Sound waves are compressive waves, they radiate spherically (in principle, turbulence in the medium is going to make them slightly irregular) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Neat! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Oh sure, bring evidence into it 🙄 lol. Um, how about sound waves? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Sound waves are compressive waves, they radiate spherically (in principle, turbulence in the medium is going to make them slightly irregular) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Neat! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Sound waves are compressive waves, they radiate spherically (in principle, turbulence in the medium is going to make them slightly irregular) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Neat! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) that's just silly permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children) Is it inaccurate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago plain wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago Apparently it is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children) Is it inaccurate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago plain wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago Apparently it is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago But photons are also particles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 3 months ago Photons are both particles and waves, not only waves (that's because of the wave-particle duality discovered by/after Einstein's theories). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (11 children) We can say that spatially, the summation of the photons movement is linear, but everything in the universe is waves and curves and we all know that to be true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (10 children) if by straight you mean a perfect eucledian line, then there's no such thing as a perfect line in nature or reality. as that might violate the Eisenberg Uncertainty principle. because if I know two points position or or if I know the direction and one point I'll know the position and direction of every point. but then that's too esoteric. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (6 children) You are clearly full of shit and have no idea what you're talking about, and your flip-flopping between positions permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (5 children) it's a meme channel, it's a stupid question, you get stupid answers. I'm not putting my name in a paper saying definitely of straight exist in nature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) If straight didn't exist in nature, it would just be gays and nothing would ever procreate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Heterosexuality is extremely rare in nature, mose animals have a lot of gay going on. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Krudler@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) Counterpoint: shut the fuck up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) you literally have the power to shut people up at will, just block em, faster and more effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago You earned it. If you were even remotely funny or clever or had anything to say I wouldn't but you're a jackass. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Your username has a typo in it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Don't do drugs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago Wayyy to late partner permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (10 children) if by straight you mean a perfect eucledian line, then there's no such thing as a perfect line in nature or reality. as that might violate the Eisenberg Uncertainty principle. because if I know two points position or or if I know the direction and one point I'll know the position and direction of every point. but then that's too esoteric. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (6 children) You are clearly full of shit and have no idea what you're talking about, and your flip-flopping between positions permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (5 children) it's a meme channel, it's a stupid question, you get stupid answers. I'm not putting my name in a paper saying definitely of straight exist in nature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) If straight didn't exist in nature, it would just be gays and nothing would ever procreate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Heterosexuality is extremely rare in nature, mose animals have a lot of gay going on. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Krudler@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) Counterpoint: shut the fuck up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) you literally have the power to shut people up at will, just block em, faster and more effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago You earned it. If you were even remotely funny or clever or had anything to say I wouldn't but you're a jackass. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Your username has a typo in it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Don't do drugs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago Wayyy to late partner permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (6 children) You are clearly full of shit and have no idea what you're talking about, and your flip-flopping between positions permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (5 children) it's a meme channel, it's a stupid question, you get stupid answers. I'm not putting my name in a paper saying definitely of straight exist in nature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) If straight didn't exist in nature, it would just be gays and nothing would ever procreate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Heterosexuality is extremely rare in nature, mose animals have a lot of gay going on. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Krudler@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) Counterpoint: shut the fuck up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) you literally have the power to shut people up at will, just block em, faster and more effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago You earned it. If you were even remotely funny or clever or had anything to say I wouldn't but you're a jackass. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (5 children) it's a meme channel, it's a stupid question, you get stupid answers. I'm not putting my name in a paper saying definitely of straight exist in nature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) If straight didn't exist in nature, it would just be gays and nothing would ever procreate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Heterosexuality is extremely rare in nature, mose animals have a lot of gay going on. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Krudler@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) Counterpoint: shut the fuck up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) you literally have the power to shut people up at will, just block em, faster and more effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago You earned it. If you were even remotely funny or clever or had anything to say I wouldn't but you're a jackass. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) If straight didn't exist in nature, it would just be gays and nothing would ever procreate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Heterosexuality is extremely rare in nature, mose animals have a lot of gay going on. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Heterosexuality is extremely rare in nature, mose animals have a lot of gay going on. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Krudler@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) Counterpoint: shut the fuck up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) you literally have the power to shut people up at will, just block em, faster and more effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago You earned it. If you were even remotely funny or clever or had anything to say I wouldn't but you're a jackass. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) you literally have the power to shut people up at will, just block em, faster and more effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Krudler@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago You earned it. If you were even remotely funny or clever or had anything to say I wouldn't but you're a jackass. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago You earned it. If you were even remotely funny or clever or had anything to say I wouldn't but you're a jackass. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Your username has a typo in it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Don't do drugs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago Wayyy to late partner permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Don't do drugs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago Wayyy to late partner permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (2 children) I work in public education. That's a pretty innocuous statement compared to some of the shit I've heard. Some teachers get so complacent in their lessons that they forget to apply it in their critical-thinking. Then, they have some crazy logical lapse, say something ridiculous out loud, and then some other kid from that class repeats that same shit to their own students when they grow up. These are mistakes that could easily be rectified with an apology or deliberate correction, but teachers are pushed so hard to prioritize being an authority figure that they sometimes forget to just be a teacher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) I'm going to pull a no true Scotsman, no good teacher would say that. yhea, there are teachers that lose it a bit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago You'll hear no arguments from me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) I'm going to pull a no true Scotsman, no good teacher would say that. yhea, there are teachers that lose it a bit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago You'll hear no arguments from me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago You'll hear no arguments from me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago Memes like this are so dumb. Laugh tracks for the internet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago It's useful as a navigational aid, if you're lost in the woods keeping an eye open for straight lines, especially horizontal, is a good way of finding man made structures and potentially a way out. Beyond that, on a micro scale nature loves perfect geometry. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago Yeah, it's a very stupid concept made into a very stupid meme to make dumb people feel dopamine over the concept of scientists being allegedly dumber than them. I really hate our species sometimes. permalink fedilink source parent