all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [B] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yeah but Vince is a dinosaur. I've heard he's still running OpenVPN. Eeeww.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Such a shame wireguard specifically won't let you hide your VPN connection on port 443 with a passthrough like OpenVPN does. Useful in some environments that like to particularly lock things down on anything that isn't a standard web port.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    There have been reports of OpenVPN traffic being discovered as VPN traffic even after using obfuscation with obfs-proxy. I believe SSL VPNs are coming out for the self-hoster, and I'm personally very interested in SoftEther

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    All fun and games until you're on a restricted network where even OpenVPN is blocked

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    All fun and games until you're on a restricted network where even OpenVPN is blocked

    This is my life. Customer's site does DPI and terminates any VPN traffic on any port or protocol before connection is even established. Their VPN works, anything else gets dropped.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Now do it without allowing a third-party control ingress access to your home LAN.

  • source