top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 166 points 3 months ago (10 children)

"because that's just how things are done"

Then things are done in a stupid way for stupid reasons that nobody likes and we shouldn't do it then.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 163 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    A little girl sees her mum cooking sausages and asks "mum, why do you cut the ends off of the sausages before you fry them?" Her mum replies "well, that's how I learned it from my mother."

    So the girl calls her grandma and asks "grandma, why do you and mum always cut the ends off of sausages before you fry them?" The grandma replies "well, that's how I learned it from my mother."

    So the girl calls her great grandmother and asks "great grandma, why do you, mum and grandma always cut the ends off of sausages before you fry them?" The great grandma replies "have they not bought a bigger pan yet?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    “because that’s just how things are done”

    Yeah, that's the essence of conservatism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    And also "this is how we've always done it" - cool, you've always done it wrong.

    I literally did that when I started my current gig, because they were doing so many things manually that were trivially automated and didn't require a three page checklist and multiple hours of time. Within 3 months I took a 4-5hr/instance task into a 30 minute one that also gives you 80% of the shit you need to check off on the QA sheet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 109 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    /c/autism is leaking.

    This is me to my core. (I mean, just check the username.) The easiest way to lose my trust is to say the reason is "because I said so." Okay, but why do you say so? Is there a real reason, or are you being a buzz-kill? Because plenty of people have arbitrary reasons for things and sometimes that's what it comes down to.

    I can recall specific instances where I was given a reason and it made all the difference. Like a lot of little kids, I used to scream when having fun. Just saying, "Don't do that" didn't make an impact. But when my mom explained that when she hears me scream, she thinks I'm in trouble, and if I scream for no reason it'd make it harder for her to respond if I were actually in trouble, that's the day I stopped.

    A little bit of explanation can go a long way. Sometimes people treat kids like they can't understand deeper reasoning, but that's not true for everyone.

    I pay it forward now. A kid I worked with preferred to point at things using his middle finger instead of his pointer finger, even when the thing he was pointing at was on the ceiling. When I told him to use his pointer instead and he asked why, I told him, "Some people think that means something very mean. I don't want people to think you're trying to be mean." That's all it took for him to start using his index finger instead.

    Point is, when people explain why something is done a certain way, they can be far more likely to respect their rule. I get that there are times when quick obedience is required, like when there's imminent danger. However, explaining more trivial situations builds the trust necessary to navigate those moments better. If someone's always pushing for authority over arbitrary things, they shouldn't be surprised when people (especially kids) don't listen to them when the matter is serious. Which is why I take the time to explain things with the kids I work with - sometimes we really do need to move quickly, particularly when another kid is acting out aggressively and we need to leave the room. They know I'll give reasons when there is time, so when I tell them to do something with urgency, they know things are getting real and it's time to move.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 months ago

    I think one of the reasons some of the little kids in my life like me is I try to give them honest explanations. They don't always fully understand, but I think they appreciate getting answers. And probably appreciate the occasional "I don't know, actually. Let's look it up"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago

    it's frankly baffling to me that people don't just throw in a one-sentence explanation of why kids should do things, how tf are they supposed to learn?

    Something i've come to realize is that an absolutely horrifying amount of my """autistic""" traits were just from not having had the opportunity to learn things, like when i was a kid i literally didn't understand that i was supposed to speak up if i'm in pain, i just sort of assumed that adults knew and didn't care.
    Just in the past 5-10 years my life has been hugely improved by seeking out knowledge on my own, to the point that i now find informal social stuff so easy that other people are impressed.

    It's why i'm an ardent supporter of the idea that most (or at least many) disabilities are almost entirely a problem with society, not the individual. And the depressing thing is that a lot of the adjustments to be made are really not that significant at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    My parents did this as well, and I have massive respect for them because of it. Similarly, the only time my dad would yell at me was when something was urgent and dangerous and he needed me to do the thing right then and there's no time to explain. I knew I could always ask for an explanation after the fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    some of these mysterious rules are peer pressure from dead people; fuck that. some of these are safety rules meant for conditions that no longer exist

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    What is an example of a safety rule who's conditions no longer exist which would not have the conditions almost immediately return if the rule was removed?

    Like every example I can think of is a regulation to stop companies from hurting people which they would simply resume doing given the choice, thus making us still need the rule?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago

    What is an example of a safety rule who’s conditions no longer exist which would not have the conditions almost immediately return if the rule was removed?

    My job is populated by dinosaurs that only recently adopted git for version control. They had some rules and procedures that made a kind of sense when deployment meant "I'll scp the files to the prod server", but don't add value anymore.

    Some people had a rule where after "deploy" they would SSH into prod and check the md5 hash of the files and compare them to their local copy. You don't have to do that.

    They also wanted to only allow one person to work on a file at the same time because "you can overwrite their changes". Git handles that fine (unless you really fuck up the merge conflict, admittedly)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 58 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Sometimes the real reason is uncomfortable and they don't want to say it out loud. Like, "the CEO is an idiot, and wants it this way for stupid reasons"

    Though maybe "the CEO doesn't understand how Google calendar works, so he thinks putting our time off in a shared spreadsheet is easier" would satisfy?

    At my job a lot of stupid things come out of "someone high ranking doesn't understand computers" or "they don't benefit from fixing this, so it's easier for them to leave it stupid"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (17 children)

    ITT rampant discrimination/ableism. People acting like the world is functional or that most rules make sense and are grounded in reality.

    If somebody asks why a rule is the way it is, something really beautiful happens if people entertain and allow that questioning.

    Was the rule made that way to simply punish someone in the past? Could the rule be improved? Does the rule apply to the present day? Could the rule be done away with?

    If the enforcement of rules is taken seriously, the questioning, validity, and improvement of those rules should be, as well.

    Otherwise, we live in an authoritarian society that actively encourages enforcing/following draconian rules no one understands - rules that would likely be enforced improperly or in an unbalanced sense, because nobody can properly explain it when somebody questions the rule (in good faith).

    Having trouble with authority and/or being neurodivergent doesn't mean you are anti-social, dangerous, or bad for the workplace.

    Bad rules, however, can be anti-social or create a culture of anti-social behavior, they can be dangerous or harmful (especially if they can not be explained and are not widely understood), and they can be bad for the workplace. It may just not be readily apparent when everybody keeps their heads down and says yes all the time to bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] [S] 29 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    It's like people think I'm just trying to be an asshole. I really don't like starting conflict without having a good reason, and questioning the questionable is one of the best reasons out there.

    I swear, some of my recent posts have brought out some nasty responses that I didn't expect. On one hand, I don't want to hold myself back from posting stuff just because I fear unjustified backlash. At the same time, I need to better prepare myself for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [+] 46 points 3 months ago (93 children)
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago*

    Questioning social norms doesn't necessarily makes you an asshole, it depends on how it is approached.

    By not defying them we will remain stagnant, imagine the downhill slope we would end up on if no one ever questioned why a man shouldn't love another man or a woman shouldn't love another woman.

    People shut you down because many are intolerant to change and have their values under scrutiny is seen as hostile, but that doesn't imply compliance is productive. Of course, you don't want to this all the time, but teaching your kid to repress their displease of social norms doesn't sound good either.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    because if you want to succeed let alone survive in life the attitude needs to change or it needs to hide.

    Framing things this way is a big mistake and I don't see why it isn't more obvious to people that it's a mistake. You want someone you care about to believe that there is a binary choice between a sustainable existence and resolving their emotional needs? You couldn't make a more persuasive argument for suicidal thinking and self destructive behavior if you tried. And it isn't even true because they are mutually dependent priorities. It took me too many years and therapy to figure this out, you should really consider approaching the issue from a different angle than this one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago

    social norms have reasons as well. you cant just say "because social norms exist" and expect someone to accept that answer as a reason. its basically the same as saying "because everyone says so". so why dont you explain why the particular social norm is one in the first place. if you dont know maybe you need to find out before you try to enforce it on others.

    also as an autistic person you shouldn't be encouraging people to mask. that shit is incredibly damaging to people. i masked for most of my life and what people dont see is that i was basically just surviving that whole time. i developed an incredible amount of anxiety, to the point where i couldnt really function in society for more than a few hours at a time before i had to isolate for a day or two to recover. i wore the mask so often for so long i didnt even know who i really was anymore. i didnt start to live until a few years ago when i started making a concerted effort to take off the mask and be myself. and you know what, people fucking accepted me way more than they ever did when i was being fucking fake all the time for the sake of appearances. you might mean well telling your son and all the autists who will see your comment to mask to get by, but all youre doing is fucking hurting them and you need to stop. masking isnt for us, its for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    "If you don't learn to adopt them you will isolate yourself" might be true if there was 1 neurodivergent person. We are a community and personally I'm not interested in being more than acquaintances if I have to mask around you all the time. That's not a mutually beneficial relationship.

    Autistics are constantly told this lie and it completely ignores the fact that there's plenty of other autistics that will understand and accommodate each other's needs.

    This is an ableist way to see the world and my lived experience directly contradicts it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (51 replies)
    [–] 42 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I mean I usually do have a problem with authority, mostly because they can't adequately explain why.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago

    And because they hurt people. And will not apologise or even acknowledge it and prevent it from happening again. See different religions, police forces, politicians, CEOs, ... fuck authorities, if they don't have a proper process to deal with their own errors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 3 months ago

    What I learned to do is mentally answer my own question with

    "Because at the end of the month we will get a 4 number number added to the bank account, which we need for wifey to get dino nuggies"

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    My biggest motivation to work is pure spite. Especially as an engineer. If I'm told my idea for something is shit without sufficient explanation - I'll be secretly working on that to either discover myself why it's shit or come back at ya with "SEE?!".

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 38 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I mean, often what people mean is "I don't have the time and/or energy right now to explain it to you".

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    "Because we'll stop paying you if you don't do it."

    ...well, that's fairly convincing.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    The ultimate hidden truth of the world is that it is something that we make, and could just as easily make differently.

    – David Graeber

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 30 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Ah pathological demand avoidance. It's not my inability to cope with ambiguity that's the problem, it's everyone else's inability to meet my arbitrary standards.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 30 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I feel like this meme being originally from an autism community, posted outside of it without that context, has lead to some egregiously bad takes in the comments. Unfortunately ironic. People coming in here having no idea what the autistic experience of people giving vague instructions and then just assuming you will figure stuff out is like. And then the reverse; trying your best to explain a process in hopes that there will be no ambiguity, only to be accused of being condescending.

    And of course we have a plethora of "well in this edge case, its actually necessary to not question instructions!" takes, as if we are talking about last minute bomb defusals, instead of everyday office procedure or insensitive social situations. People on the spectrum are a great showcase of how unwilling the average person is to question the status quo.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 29 points 3 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 3 months ago* (5 children)

    I agree but I can also accept that I’m not necessarily capable of understanding a reason why. Something not making sense to me personally doesn’t inherently mean it doesn’t make sense objectively. Maybe I’m lacking context or perspective or I’m ignorant to some important factor. I’m not the arbiter of what makes sense or not and my ego isn’t so big that I think I get to be the one who decides what makes sense and what doesn’t. If a person can explain to me why it’s important to them and it can withstand some poking or prodding that’s good enough for me. Sometimes it’s an understanding problem not an explaining problem. I accept the rules of physics are real but I don’t actually understand them in any depth, it’s the same thing. Humility is important too.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    i'm not sure why "social cues" and "authority" would have much to do with each other, it's not like anarchists are socially inept, in fact being socially adept is kinda a core part of functional anarchy.

    I dislike arbitrary things as well, but thanks to the magic of understanding how to be social i can just talk to people about it and explain why i think arbitraryness sucks ass, and they then treat me nicely and feel bad about my struggles since i'm so easy to deal with.
    And it's not like i'm some 10 charisma bard, simply being chill and not actively unpleasant gets you 80% of the way. Even if you never make eye contact you'll still be seen as pretty normal if you speak normally and follow basic conversational etiquette.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 21 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    "It's there for a reason" drives me bonkers. Sometimes the reason is bad!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The secret ingredient is violence. Often legal state-mandated violence, otherwise just plain abuse and violence that's willingly ignored by the authorities.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›