all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 2 months ago

He is the gigachad image

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 2 months ago

    Let's go Brandon indeed

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago

    While it's indeed fake, the satire was fun. It notes that whenever you see a Let's Go Brandon bumper sticker, it's in regards to this very famous gay porn star. Same with the chants. Those guys were just big fans of gay porn, y'know.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago

    So the good news is he got 35 of 'em, the bad news is that it's just 35 of 'em. Hope they'll release him soon.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    That's gotta be a high score

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Man I really wish this wasn't a fake news story...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (15 children)

    Is it ever appropriate to use an apostrophe to pluralize a word?

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    Is it ever appropriate to use an apostrophe to pluralize a word?

    I stumbled upon exceptions on Wikipedia not long ago including, e.g., pluralizing single letters (Oakland A's) and symbols (#'s).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    I was wondering about that. I assumed there wasn't exceptions, because those can still be possessive. Oakland A's members or 13's unlucky superstition. I'm not surprised though, because English is a stupid mess of a language.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

    I'm not natively English but isn't that always when you could read it wrong without the apostrophe? E.g. it's zoos and bows, but not hos?

    Edit: this example doesn't really do much, since you could argue about it's ho's nazi or a nazi's ho, and hoes is probably more correct anyway. I retract myself from this discussion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Not native either, but pretty sure apostrophe-s is about ownership whereas just s is about plural. eg.:

    "It's a dog's bark."

    "The dogs are barking."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    "Its" vs "it's" is probably the most common mistake in the English language. Apostrophe is used for ownership as well as contraction, BUT contraction supersedes ownership. So its means ownership and it's means it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Nah, but that is how some people view and use it. It doesn't bother me personally if it seems intentional to quicken clarity. It at least makes more sense to me than possession on a name ending in 's', E.G. Bernie Sanders' policies. It breaks down further if the Sanders had a family reunion, what is the Sanderses'? Sanders'? preference for food?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Afaik it's not just how people use it but what has been agreed upon by the respective rulemakers. I was just commenting on whether it's appropriate though, completely agree it's arbitrary and imperfect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Not quite. No apostrophe usually means plural. With apostrophe means possessive or a contraction (what is to what's). Its/it's is an edge case where the possessive "its" has no apostrophe and contraction "it's" does.

    All that being said, native speakers mistype all of these all of the time, so you don't have to worry about it for casual conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Dude looks like Wolfenstein 3D's B.J. Blazkowicz.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Least realistic thing about it is that if there were 35 Neonazis in one place that the cops wouldn't be there too.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Newsweek says it didn't happen. In 2022.

    Disappointed, though. It should have happened.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    35‽ Wow, either he was on a super cocaine rampage or the Nazis are bigger pussies than we realized..

    My money is on the naizs = pussies

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Lol they let him get to 35 before doing something 🤣

  • source