31
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Dave8008@feddit.uk 2 points 7 hours ago

Feels very much like a protection racket

[-] evadersnack@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

They’re slowly becoming the necessary evil in this day and age. At least they’re not Meta, Google, Anthropic, OpenAI / Microsoft, or Amazon.

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Another thing is centralization. Cloudflare has a fuck-up? A huge swath of the internet might go offline for hours.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

That goes for any CDN provider, cloud hosting provider, etc. Amazon, Akamai, and others have all suffered significant outages that knocked large swaths of the internet offline. It’s certainly nothing unique to Cloudflare.

[-] forestbeasts@pawb.social 35 points 1 day ago

Because they're literally MITM-as-a-service. I wish I was exaggerating.

Seriously. If a website uses Cloudflare, Cloudflare can see everything you do on that website. Stuff you say. What pages you go to and what you're looking at. Any passwords you type in. Everything.

(And your browser doesn't warn you about that because Cloudflare has a legit cert for the site; as far as your browser is concerned they ARE the site.)

-- Frost

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Every single CDN provider works this way, and the internet as we know it wouldn’t work without them. If you don’t like that Cloudflare works this way then you should be upset at Amazon, Akamai, Google, Fastly, and many others as well.

[-] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Wow, thanks. I didn't know. Get my upvote! Honestly, this is the best reply on this post.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The thing is, every CDN provider does the exact same thing, and the modern internet wouldn’t work without them. Cloudflare gets a bad rap largely because they offer free and low cost services that are very attractive to individuals, hobbiests, etc.

Companies like Akamai, Fastly, AWS, etc. offer virtually identical services but you may never have heard of them because they mostly only offer services to corporate customers. But their CDNs operate the same way - by decoding the traffic so they can analyze it for purposes of caching it to speed up delivery.

Edit: Love how my comments are being downvoted. What I’ve said here is 100% accurate and true. I used to work at Akamai, and still work with it on a daily basis at my current employer so I have a lot of knowledge of the platform. If you think what I’m saying isn’t accurate then just say so.

[-] forestbeasts@pawb.social 1 points 12 hours ago

Yeah it's... DEFINITELY a thing you should know, and definitely a thing they don't want you to know, because they want you to not even know they're there!

At least with normal trackers that embed JS on the page, like Google, which can also snoop on basically everything you do by the way, if you block the tracker you're relatively safe (until they change the tracker, until you get an updated filter list... it's a constant back and forth).

You can't block Cloudflare MITMing you. ("man-in-the-middle", they pretend to be the server and pass on everything you say to the server and the server's response to you, while probably writing down everything for their own purposes. this is a large part of what HTTPS was explicitly intended to protect against...)

[-] c10l@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

This very much. They are probably the largest private worldwide vigilance operation ever to exist.

Unfortunately they provide services that are very valuable to some organisations, so they get away with it.

[-] Yliaster@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

It's fucking irritating to have to visit the same websites you used to just fine a year or so ago now becomes slow and require you to spend a good 5-10 seconds on a fucking "confirm you are human" check (as if google and co doesn't give us enough of that shit already). Worse, it doesn't even work sometimes, often loops, and if you're on a different/niche browser? Good luck.

[-] forestbeasts@pawb.social 5 points 12 hours ago

Oh, yeah, and if you block cloudflare.com third party JS and whatnot, guess what? that doesn't work! it just displays a vaguely patronizing error message.

(It used to just say "unblock challenges.cloudflare.com to proceed" which was significantly less offensive, IMO. Treated you like a person who knows what you're doing, which you are if you've decided to manually block cloudflare.com, and tells you what the exact domain at issue is if you feel like giving in.)

-- Frost

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

This doesn't address the issue with Cloudflare. Yes, they provide an anti-crawler service for web hosts. However, essentially every website needs this, and it's done regardless of Cloudflare. It's just a fact of the modern internet.

[-] Yliaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I practically never come across these checks outside of google and cloudflare.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 minutes ago

Have you seen the anime Canadian girl for Anubis? That's the big non-cloudflare alternative.

[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Owners of the said websites don't have to use this check.

[-] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

What do you propose instead to combat AI companies stealing from your site?

[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I am trying htaccess at the moment, so far I am not getting bots in my logs. But I don't see anything bad on using Cloudflare. But I don't understand people hating Cloudflare for the tool they offer. I also find it annoying, hence I don't run it on my stuff.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

jesus lemmings are idiots

you've heard of ai crawlers? yes, no?

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

I mean yeah this doesn’t address the annoyances we must all live with but no; most Lemmings are not web admins and have no fucking idea what has happened to the internet in the last 5 years. It’s very behind the scenes to them, as this thread shows - most people think “CloudFlare bad because they make me prove I’m human” and not “CloudFlare bad because they read all proxied traffic unencrypted and pass that info to whoever wants it”

[-] Yliaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

You're a dumbass if you think that justifies making the internet unusable.

Look, man, the internet isn't for users anymore, it is for bits to get blocked.

[-] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 day ago

TLDR: Because they are the best at gaming the system.

Long version

They provide a really valuable thing to hosters: protection and reliability. The promise: "we take care that your website stays online".

Plus they have a very good caching infrastructure meaning my server isn't under as much pressure when I usee cloudflare.

For a user this is visible in two ways: bot testing stuff and slower load time, in individual perception.

And now the downside: they've created a spiderweb, sitting in the middle and most things online are entangled. "But I don't user cloudflare for my website!"? Tough luck. Some routing instance in between your users and your server might. The bit protection? Used to train various machine learning algorithms. Providing any kind of automation service online? If cloudflare marks you as something negative you're dead, no appeal.

They are from my assessment the single most powerful Internet company existing and they are staying nearly invisible on the public radar.

They pushed themselves into every problem people had with the more complicated layer in the whole Internet thing and made it easier for users - and leverage every information byte they collect on the way.

That said: I don't hate them; I'm just really miss trusting with this amount of power and influence centralized. They utilize the whole infrastructure to become a more engrained entity.

[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I'm just really miss trusting

Is there a mr trusting in the picture?

I'll see myself out

[-] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Is this an application? ;)

[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Yes, an application of wordplay :D

[-] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 6 points 1 day ago

Some routing instance in between your users and your server might.

Although that should only be possible if the user has a hijacked client or you're not using HTTPS. Or am I forgetting something?

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Cloud flare issue certificates on your behalf when they cache. They also have nameservers. However, I assume that is only for their customers.

[-] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

I miss framed this: the concern here for me is not a malicious attack but that you're still affected in terms of routing: your service becoming unavailable because your hoster or their ISP relied on cloudflare.

[-] rozodru@piefed.world 7 points 1 day ago

I'll throw myself into the fire here. I use Cloudflare. I host a couple small websites with them that I don't pay for. why? it's easy, it's free, it works very well with my stack and dev environment and for me it's faster than what I was previously using/hosting with.

I made the decision recently to allow the "product to speak for itself" as opposed to making my tech decisions based on a POS Dev or CEO that works for whatever company. I needed a VPN and email hosting along with PW management that I just didn't want to deal with myself anymore so I said fuck it and went with proton regardless of what others may feel about them. On one of my machines I needed a decent and fast to set up tiling window manager so I said fuck it and installed hyprland regardless of the opinions of the lead dev. a few other examples like that. I figured if I held every company to the same moral standards as myself then I'd never get anything done.

Call me a hypocrite and what have you, fine. but honestly at this point everyone has their hands dirty and if we looked into the people who built EVERYTHING we use we'd probably end up using nothing. So do a lot of people not like Cloudflare? yes. Are their opinions on the matter valid? also yes. But if it and other things currently work for me and provide what I need I'll keep using them until they stop working for me.

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 9 points 1 day ago

Because it's annoying to have that pop up everywhere and sometimes it decides you can't visit a website or need to wait 10s or so. And then again right after you click the next link.

And one day it might cut you off from half the internet for good? Hasn't happened yet. But ultimately it's a singular, big, ugly American company, now in charge of most of the internet. Including access to people's data/traffic when all they want is evade big tech.

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago

Me personally? Because they proudly host and protect hate sites

[-] DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

Why not add 5 more seconds to the loading time of every website you visit?

Note: that’s just why I hate cloudflare, I have no idea why everybody else does 😝

[-] makeshift0546@lemmy.today -3 points 1 day ago

Because they are successful and pretty much own the market.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

If you think we’re all just jealous of their profits then you’re a literal Ferengi

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
31 points (94.3% liked)

Out of the loop

15244 readers
82 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS