I'm no expert, but I feel like you could say "This law doesn't actually go after the people it should, targeting innocent people instead." and you'd be fine, not doing...whatever this was. I don't often come away from an article with the feeling that the author has women tied up in their basement, but this is one of those times.
Michael Tracey is an Epstein truther, in the sense that he doesn't think the epstein files have proof of anything illegal in them and there's no proof he did any sex trafficking. He also routinely defends (other) pedophiles and sex abusers.
Yeah, and I'm sure his intention with this article was to try and make me think the opposite of that. But if I didn't think he was claiming "Epstein did nothing wrong" before reading this, I certainly think he does now. Which I'm guessing wasn't the point, but it's the only real takeaway I got from it.
That's a whole lot of words to say that these sex trafficking laws are often used to go after sex workers and people soliciting sex workers.
He needed to get his support of sex criminals in
Based on that quote, without reading it, I divine that his "point" is that lying to someone to get them to travel for sex isn't "reeeallly" trafficking.
That. But also: Trafficking isn't even a real crime, "sex trafficker" and especially "child sex traffickers" are political smears, and also prostitution and trafficking gets conflated so trafficking isn't that bad.
Michael Tracey is a piece of work.
I cannot imagine what it must be like to sit down at a computer, type that out, and somehow think it's a valuable contribution to the world.
Trying to think of a way to work nonce or paedophile into "Michael Tracey" and coming up blank
Micheal
spoiler
R*pespree
(Spoiler for obvious relevant CW)
It's a little forced, kind of like all of Michael Tracey's interactions with women, so 
People helping refugees across the border are regularly called human traffickers.
They sure are. Michael Tracey is not going to bat for those people.
I'm so close to checking what the article is actually about
Male chuds understand consent challenge, difficulty impossible.
Tracey advocating for the repeal of the Mann Act after watching Smokey and the Bandit
Slop.
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.