126
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 41 minutes ago

The White House has described the allegations as “total baselessness,”

Bullshit Barbie wording it up bigly, the greatest communicationalistic ever, believe me

[-] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 1 hour ago

No new info

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 27 points 2 hours ago
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I don't think this is Katie Johnson, since she came forward in 2016. This is the one they're talking about:

A redacted FBI report released as part of the botched release of the Epstein files revealed that the woman told interviewers Trump had forced her to perform a sexual act on him and punched her in the side of the head after she allegedly “bit the s--t out of” his penis.

Trump is then alleged to have yelled, “Get this little b---h the hell out of here,” according to an FBI memo detailing one of Jane Doe 4’s interviews.

The woman also alleged that she was assaulted multiple times by Epstein in South Carolina, as well as by a third man identified by The Post and Courier as businessman Jimmy Atkins.

Edit: And this

New investigation backs up evidence given by woman who accused Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein of sexually abusing her when she was 13

An explosive new report by the South Carolina-based newspaper The Post and Courier has corroborated several personal details provided by a woman who alleges she was sexually assaulted at the age of 13 by Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump and a third man, Jimmy Atkins, during the 1980s.

The newspaper’s investigation verified roughly 16 personal details from the woman’s 2019 FBI interviews, which investigators suggest bolsters her overall credibility.

[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

I saw a tv show where, in one episode, a rapist got bit and they were able to use the scar as evidence.

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 28 points 3 hours ago

Is this the one that, "reminded him of Ivanka?" Fucking barf dude. Sick fucks

[-] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

Maybe it's the one that robin leech strangled to death at maralago in the 90's

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 minutes ago

What?!? "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" dude? He strangled someone??

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago

Well, not that shocked.

[-] slothrop@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 hours ago
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
126 points (98.5% liked)

politics

30226 readers
2103 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS