you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)

It doesn't require much science. Victim testifies she bit the attacker and it drew blood. Attacker has scar of approximately the same age. That's not going to secure a conviction on its own, but it adds to the prosecution's evidence.

If it didn't draw blood, it'd be harder to find a lasting mark.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment