top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 119 points 2 months ago (76 children)

Being an American wanting an electric car must be a nightmare!
Not many options, and all of them are too expensive, because competition is stifled by keeping competition out with insane tariffs.

In Europe we are spoiled with choice, lots of European brands with lots of models, and we even have American although we don't want them, but we also have Chinese although they do have an EU import tax, to compensate for the Chinese subsidies.

But several Chinese brands are becoming quite popular, especially BYD and XPeng have become popular here in Denmark.

  • source
  • hideshow 76 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 months ago* (25 children)

    Yeah, it's extremely frustrating here. The EV market actively sucks with limited options and inflated prices. I also bought a used Polestar 2 last year, so now I'm extra frustrated.

    My guess, however, is that PS just didn't care to deal with obtaining the waiver- the brand has sold poorly here in the US and they've been posturing to exit the market for a few years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (22 children)

    For some reason Polestar doesn't seem to be doing as well as it deserves in many markets.
    I hope you can have yours maintained as long as is required even if they leave the market.

    It was a runner up when we bought our EV.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago* (20 children)

    If they're priced the same as the US models, it's little wonder they're not selling well. MSRP for the P2 was ~70k USD which is a non-starter for most folks.

    I got mine used at 4 years old with 74k miles on it (fortunately EVs generally tend to last towards 200k miles barring any other issues) for 20k, it's the only reason I could afford to buy it. Otherwise I was probably going to go with an ID.4 which was at a similar price point. What did you end up going with?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (9 children)

    We ended up with a 4 year old ID.4, 😋
    We could have had a more powerful Polestar cheaper, except my wife didn't want anything Chinese, and insurance was more than 50% more expensive on the faster Polestar.
    But we got a nice ID.4 77 kWh battery, and with literally all the options included.
    One of our neighbors however went with the Volvo, which is also very nice.

    Driving electric is really nice IMO, it feels absolutely super luxury compared to a similar ICE car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Absolutely agreed, I can't imagine going back to an ICE car for my daily driver unless I absolutely have to.

    I periodically have to rent a car for work (I travel a lot) and never realized how much noise engines make until it was conspicuously missing from car. The PS is also just super comfortable and feels great on the road, while my rentals rarely are/do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago* (15 children)

    It’s gets better. Even if you find an EV, the states tax you more than an ICE car. Texas has a $200 yearly fee to supposedly make up for lost gas tax revenue. But at 20c/gallon and assuming 30mpg, I’d have to drive 30,000 miles to offset that cost (only drove about 8,500 miles per year).

    And now they want to do the same at the Federal level with another $150 tax (federal taxes are 18c/gallon), which would be another 25,000 miles.

    So I would be taxed $350/year to offset “gas tax losses”, which would only even out for me if I were to drive 55,000 miles in a year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    I heard about that, and that's crazy. You gotta love all that freedom. 🤥
    I don't drive nearly that much either.
    I understand the logic of the tax on gas to pay for roads, but here an EV is taxed less because it pollutes less. USA needs more of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    Realistically we should be taxing by weight and miles driven as the former causes the most damage to the roads. At that point the propulsion type and efficiency don’t really matter. EVs actually would be taxed more given that they’re heavier, but it’d also proportionately tax trucks and larger vehicles correctly at that point.

    You could easily implement it with a yearly odometer reading with your registration or inspection and every car has a GVWR registered with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Hey just a friendly reminder those Chinese EVs are backdoored with an Elon style god mode like Tesla. Lots of modern cars have a similar issue but EVs get it bad. Tl;dr rip out your car's modem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I bet all the new cars are unfortunately, my VW is also constantly connected to VW.
    We need to make that shit illegal. Until then we have to live with it, just as with our smartphones.
    I know I can install AOSP and get rid of it, and I did use that for years, but I just want the hassle anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (6 children)

    I'm interested to see how the low-cost Chinese brands do on longer-term reliability. Their initial build quality is generally good, but their product cycles are so short that I don't see how they can capture knowledge that leads to them correcting design defects. To me, it looks like too much churn. But maybe they'll be fine. We'll have to see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    This is absolutely an issue, having used many 2nd hand cars for decades, most of them Japanese but also French because they were cheap, I was extremely astounded when we bought a 14 year old German built Opel Vectra, we had it until it reached 20 with next to no repairs, before it finally gave in mostly because of a legal technicality.

    When we had our new (used) car at the shop, and borrowed an only 8 year old mid range car, there was no doubt that compared to that, our 20 year old Vectra was still a way nicer car, faster, smoother, more powerful and better comfort, and also better looking IMO, and would absolutely be worth the repair that was only a sixth of what that 8 year old car cost on the free market!

    Problem is that our old Vectra is $850 in taxes per year, because the fuel economy isn't as good as newer cars. And that $850 per year tax kills the economy of keeping it.
    Our new car that is heavier and way more powerful is only $100 in taxes per year!! Because it's an EV.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [+] 71 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    In our reverse world, the more hyperbolic the title is the less worthwhile content the article contains. Use this to filter out content that can be safely (ironically) ignored.

  • source
  • parent
  • This is proof that you should never bend the knee or try to appease that facist state. Polestar moved production to the US and still got banned. They don't believe in non-zero sum economics, you will always be the loser even when both party's could win.

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security denied Polestar an authorization under the current Connected Vehicle Rule to sell cars in the U.S. from model year 2027 on. That’s because Polestar is a subsidiary of Geely, a Chinese automaker. Ironically, Polestar’s sister brand, also owned by Geely, Volvo, was granted the authorization in May.

    What's the Connected Vehicle Rule? From the Bureau of Industry and Security (is that a thing?):

    On January 14, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued a rule restricting the import and sale of certain connected vehicles and related hardware/software linked to China or Russia. BIS determined these transactions pose national security risks, as companies from these countries may be compelled to share data or allow remote access to connected vehicles in the United States.

    So, the reported ban seems capricious, but I wouldn't mind one solution: stop making cars connected. The key fob uses its local protocol for lock/unlock and remote start, my phone uses bluetooth for charge controls and status, and there's a scren that uses Android Auto. Car companies stop trying to write UX and network stacks.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Arbitrary actions are arbitrary.

    I'm not terrified by that, just disgusted.

    My guess is that the ulterior motive is to protect Tesla. Their competitors almost all offer better quality, and increasingly there are entrants to the market that produce those higher-quality vehicles at far lower cost. Musk seems unable or unwilling to take corrective actions, instead trying to buy the regulators.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    Why in the fuck can't I purchase a non connected vehicle?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Me looking at my 2023 Polestar 2 LRDM:

    "It's ok. They can't hurt you. You parked next to a 240i and you felt superior remember?"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Start selling Volvo's newest model... The Volvo Polestar

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (8 children)

    So the thesis of this piece is the government picking winners and losers in the auto industry through opaque mechanisms should terrify you because you should believe in total free market capitalism.

    There's plenty I don't agree with regarding this administration's trade or industrial policy. This reasoning though, ain't it. It ain't even new with this administration. I'm not getting the vapors over corrupt auto industry protectionism. And I'm certainly not concerned about whatever lib shit this guy is wound up about.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    It's because it's not transparent and seems arbitrary, this isn't mentioned but these are the perfect conditions for corruption or simple stupidity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    this isn't mentioned but these are the perfect conditions for corruption or simple stupidity

    At this point, I think it’s safe to assume corruption and stupidity are the default, much to everyone’s chagrin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    So the thesis of this piece is the government picking winners and losers in the auto industry through opaque mechanisms should terrify you because you should believe in total free market capitalism.

    Those are not the only choices. For example, a rules-based and facts-based system of regulation is another possibility. But the current system's rule appears to be that the spoils go to whoever got a slice of Trump's goldfish-like attention, or wrote him a fat enough check.

    And you might well get the vapors the next time one of the US automakers receives a massive government bailout because their having been protected from competition left them unable to compete in the global market, or possibly even in the time before that when US consumers are being forced to buy sub-mediocre products in order to fatten the bonuses of non-performing parasitic executives.

    And it's good to remember that free markets are a myth, and that real capitalists love anything that shelters them from having to compete, even if it's protectionism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›