top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 100 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A second Keir, and just as genocidal

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Wanted to say the same. From the frying pan into the fire. Labour will get wrecked in the next elections.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Only for the similarly Israel funded Reform to win, because while we keep fighting on whether the next candidate is anti-Israel enough, Reform manages to unite the dumbfucks of the country.

    And if Brexit has proven anything it's that the damn country has way too many dumbfucks who'll gladly throw away everything just so a guy who blames the "right" people for the country's troubles gets to be PM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    I'm sorry that I draw the line at genocide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    The "I'm flexible when it comes to child mass murder abroad if that stops the far-right for 4/5 more years here" crowd are something else.

    That's not having any Morals or Principles beyond "what in it for me".

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 68 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    Oh, awesome. Another genocide apologist.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 31 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Sure, and 9/11 was just a navigation error.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Israel is doing exactly what it was made to do, why would the USA and UK betray their own creation? Especially since it's working.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago*

    It's the greatest and most successful White Supremacist Nation of the present day, so of course it elicits warm fatherly feelings at least amongst the British Elites (who, by the way, before Hitler invaded Poland actually liked the NAZIs)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 2 months ago*

    What a disgusting excuse for a human being.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago

    Tells me everything I needed to know about him

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago

    At least, not until they're all gone. /s

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    The UK were instrumental in giving birth to this settler-colony by issuing the Balfour declaration in 1917, taking Palestine over after World War 1, arresting and executing Palestinian nationalists during the Arab uprising in 1936, and training the Irgun and Hagana Jewish terror gangs and then promptly high tailing it out of there when the going got rough. So its no surprise that British politicians are hand in glove supporting this current genocide.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Not that the 1917 Balfour declaration was well written or overly centered on justice-- "The Balfour Declaration" was merely a very short letter from a British foreign secretary Balfour to Lord Rothschild to sway Jews broadly for their support during WW1, when Jewish people globally were leaning heavily toward the German cause. It was not an official promise or policy document or government statement-- but zionists pretended it was more of an eternal policy declaration than it was. Israel immediately violated what protections the Balfour letter vaguely imagined.

    Balfour specified that "nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine".

    Zionists immediately launched into violating civil and religious rights in minute #1 of the Israeli state's existence and they've never stopped for a single second since. There has never been an Israel there that wasnt based on hatred, racism, and vicious oppression that massively violates civil and religious rights.

    You also said the UK trained Irgun. I think you are mistaken. Irgun was primarily trained by instructors from the Polish Armed Forces in 1938 and 1939, with supplementary instruction received at the Military Engineers School in Fascist Italy. The training was facilitated through partnerships forged by Vladimir Jabotinsky’s Revisionist Zionist movement. Training Irgun was a nazi project. Irgun then became the IDF. Heres an interesting read on that: https://fpif.org/running-war/

    Irgun was attacking the Brits with terrorism attacks right before Israel was formed. Heres a timeline of those many attacks against the British.

    https://www.palquest.org/en/overallchronology?nid=139&chronos=139

    I'd argue that Israel was as much or more a nazi creation as it was the UK.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago

    Another fucking coward.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago

    Splendid, another twat.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago

    What a stupid asshole.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago*

    Very enthusiastic slaughter of civilians will do too. Hello Starmer v2.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It never gets better, the next one is always worse

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    "Big thing too big, politicians only think small, not big. Me not want to say what I really think".. neither do I Andy, because you'd have me kicked out of the country just like your predecessor. Same shit different asshole.

    I guess the pile of dead children is probably too big for him to acknowledge now. Where do you find such morally empty sad disgusting bitch ass fucking losers?

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    I'm somewhat suspicious of the way the Guardian didn't actually publish the interview itself, but just their journalist's writeup of it. We're not told what the question he answered actually was, just what it was "about", and then the headline writers of the outlets quoting that quote take it a step further into implying that he's a full-on genocide denier.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Person wanting to be prime minister says least surprising (or doesn't) thing ever. What did people expect?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Britain: the more things are made to look like they're changing, the more they stay the same.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Fine, call it a "shadow" genocide, package it with the Epstein files, and let's get the ball rolling on ridding the world leadership of pedophiles!

    Or, I'm guessing, we won't.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    Amazing. They should have also asked him whether he can judge Russia’s war against Ukraine, China’s genocidal atrocities against Uyghurs, Tibetans, Mongolians and other minorities. And the war in Sudan. What does he say?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    He wouldn't be the next in line if he did

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    We did it Reddit

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›