556
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top new old

University general chemistry introduced all these wonderful rules the universe followed and everything suddenly made sense and all was right with the world. Then organic chemistry spent class after class explaining how it was all BS and how every rule had so many exceptions that they weren't actually rules anymore, and the walks back from class were gloomy and sullen.

[-] iocase@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 weeks ago

I went through the same thing with electronics being taught the water model then you're told to throw that out because AC doesn't act like water.

I say bullshit! My instructors didn't understand AC well enough IMO

Once you understand AC well enough you realize it still applies to the water model of electrical flow. Induction is inertia, capacitance is pipe deformation from pressure.

When you slam a valve shut in an old house you make a massive pressure spike (inductive field collapse, flyback voltage spike) which oscillates within a resonant circuit when the pipes absorb that extra pressure by expanding, then releasing that spike back into inertia, which makes a smaller spike back into hoop stress until friction (resistance) saps all of the energy out of the circuit.

You can make a DC-DC boost converter by opening and closing a valve really quickly on a long pipe and feed the pressure spikes into a check valve.

[-] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

Wish I had you as a teacher

[-] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

Aren't water flow, electrical flow, and mechanical flow all strictly analogous? As in mathematically equivalent, not just similar?

[-] iocase@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah they are but it seems like most electrical instructors don't know that they just think "water is close enough as an analogy to electricity but breaks with AC" when in fact they're both identical. So they'll tell you to forget the water model while teaching you AC. The inertia/pipe strain comparison is very rare to hear.

[-] Gust@piefed.social 17 points 3 weeks ago

If it makes you feel better, thats also true in every other field of science. All models are wrong, but some are useful

[-] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

depends on how you define science. if math is science, then no.

[-] Gust@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

Strange take, given the source of the quote

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

gen chem was so brutal, many dint pass. or had to retake it. at least not with better than a C. and thats with universities generally lowering the average for each grade so people "can attempt to pass"

[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 23 points 3 weeks ago

Organic chemistry in a nutshell.

[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

As someone who had done grad school in chemistry.....yes. You thought MO theory could explain most things but then there's reactions that (presumably) go against Woodward-Hoffman rules. Then there's other rules that go against other theories.

Maybe we just need to solve the Schrodinger equation. Haha.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 13 points 3 weeks ago

A scientific model is valid within its limits of applicability. We will likely never be able to establish natural science models that escape this, even in physics.

[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 11 points 3 weeks ago

Chemistry is just the peg and hole game children play with for adults

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I would've learned chemistry a lot better if someone told me up front that the rules were just heuristics

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 3 weeks ago

or dint cram 2 semesters into 1.

[-] Qkall@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

weeps in physical chemistry

That shit fucked me up....

[-] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

I once saw a bumper sticker that said "honk if you passed p chem" and I honked so excitedly I almost hit a curb.

[-] SpeakerToLampposts@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

That's true of pretty much everything. As John Von Neumann put it, "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations."

[-] Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago

All models are wrong, some models are useful

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

And that's why I dropped Chemistry at the last minute my first semester

[-] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

My brain would short circuit. The irony of just getting something right to, then, realize it's complications.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
556 points (99.8% liked)

Science Memes

20710 readers
825 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged, but keep it in good faith and never punch down.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS