ok so i've seen people say that lewd things are bad. why is that? i'd like to hear it from you personally.

i've come up with a variety of theories so far but none really track.

all 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (17 children)

prudish people

Wanna try again with an opening that isn't so bad faith?

Edit: Well, didn't take long to prove my point and double-down. OP laughed at someone's genuine response. OP is getting the "bad faith troll" user tag

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 3 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (13 children)

    Prude is an insult. If you want genuine dialogue with people, don't insult them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    I disagree. It's a term that describes a specific personality trait, which is exactly what they are asking about. If you have a bad connotation with the word, that's not their fault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (9 children)

    The word has a long history of having that connotation. It has nothing to do with what I feel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prude

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    A prude is a person with a very sensitive attitude and narrowness towards custom and morality.[1][2] The word prude comes from the Old French word prudefemme also prodefemme meaning loyal, respectable or modest woman,

    This is what you linked. THIS sounds offensive?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Protip: if a word has a section called 'Perjorative use' on wikipedia, that means it's not a nice thing to call people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Just prefacing this by saying that I agree that prude is more pejorative than not.

    But, in that section of the Wikipedia article you pointed out, there's 3 [citation needed]'s and the citations that are there, are for: two thesaurus', a book of first names, and a paper on translating indecent language.

    None of these actually supports your point, because we don't know who wrote that section or why, and they provided no proper sources for their opinions. This is one of the cases where Wikipedia is a bad source when it usually pretty solid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The dictionary definition shows that today it's only ever used pejoratively:

    a person who is excessively proper or modest in speech, conduct, dress, etc.

    I have never once heard it used as a descriptor, as that's not how it's used today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    a person who is excessively proper or modest in speech, conduct, dress, etc.

    That definition in no way describes the word prude as being pejorative.

    And one person's personal anecdotes also doesn't really prove that it's an insult.

    Did you not actually read my comment? It was about how the original person was using a bad source to prove their point, which you are also doing.

    And to reiterate the very first thing I said, I do in fact believe that the word prude is pejorative. But that is beside the point I've been trying to make. Which is: if you're trying to make a point using sources, make sure they are actually good ones.

    Here's an actual source that backs up your point. Of course that's only one source when every other dictionary definition I looked up didn't say either way whether it was insulting.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    You really shouldn't let silly things like that trigger you.

    It might come off as prudish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Ah, yes "trigger you" yet more sophistry. You're not here for a discussion, but to win an argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I'm just here to converse, crack some jokes, and waste time. I didn't think OP meant anything malicious by using that word, so I stood up for them.

    No hate crimes have been committed here today.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Most prudish and formerly prudish people that I know were taught to be scared of sex.

    They are also usually told horror stories about diseases and how it shreds parts of your heart and how it makes you an animal instead of a human.

    But yeah, it's either fear or a desire to live in a better world.

    There is a certain amount of power in being the kind of person that you're not allowed to talk about sex with unless you're in a relationship with them and behind closed doors.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    In my case - and this isn't quite an answer to your question, but - I only have a problem with men. Too many men - not all, but enough of them - don't mind their bodily hygiene, which I can find repulsive. This is not ideological but experience and prejudice on my side. I have the opposite prejudice - and experience - regarding women.

    Which is to say: I love sex but I hate to fear whether my next romp is going to be in a bed of flowers or in the gutter.

    PS: how interesting that I have an aversion to "the gutter" but at the same time have some other... edgy? kinks. 🤣

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    In my case as to why lewd things are bad: addiction relapse and dissociation after sexual stimuli.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Not really a prude but sometimes the vibes or something remind of a rape I experienced and it really ruins it for me.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    It's the puritanism

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    One might avoid the act because they are self-conscious (e.g. body image) rather than out of an inherent dislike.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Because of people like you.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Can people ask questions normally like mature adults for a while without baiting for negative reactions?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    how is that "baiting for negative reactions"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Gee, I don't know, how about read the first thing you wrote before asking your question?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    hmm ok then what would be a more neutral way of saying it? "prudish" is not an insult i think, at least it wasn't meant as one. what would be a more neutral expression?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    prudish people, why do you hate sex?

    • If you could be considered a prudish person when it comes to sex, can you explain why your stance on it is what it is?
    • If you hate sex, can you tell us why?
    • Could we have some asexual people explain how and why they realized that was the way they were?

    Probably a lot better ways than that, also. The phrasing of your question implies something that isn't true for all "prudes".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Hate sex? no, i support sex within a marriage.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    ok then, may i ask you, what's the reason why you disagree with sex outside marriage? as long as condoms are used

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] 2 points 3 months ago
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Ok many comments bash OP for the word choice “prudish” to point out this is a bad faith troll. I would also point out the issue with “hate sex”. There are people who are not prudish at all, and love sex, and still don’t want to see lewd things. Famously, arousal reduces thresholds for feeling disgust. I would argue that it is quite normal for humans to see overly revealing images of most bodies off putting, unless in an actual sexual situation. Then, there are people, I would be fine calling them prudish in the lack of a better term, as shyness kind of undersells this, who really don’t want to see, hear, talk about, or even mention sex. Someone like that can still really like sex- doing it, not talking about it. So “hate sex” is not the same as “don’t want to see explicit porn all the time everywhere”.

  • source