-30
prudish people, why do you hate sex?
(feddit.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
-30 points (27.3% liked)
Ask Lemmy
40987 readers
877 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world
7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.
8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Wanna try again with an opening that isn't so bad faith?
Edit: Well, didn't take long to prove my point and double-down. OP laughed at someone's genuine response. OP is getting the "bad faith troll" user tag
100%, that's what i wanted to say. I think le,my is also not a ssfe place in gwneral for expression "prudish" opinions so there's no point commenting to share, ultimately
how is that "bad faith"?
Prude is an insult. If you want genuine dialogue with people, don't insult them.
I disagree. It's a term that describes a specific personality trait, which is exactly what they are asking about. If you have a bad connotation with the word, that's not their fault.
The word has a long history of having that connotation. It has nothing to do with what I feel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prude
A prude is a person with a very sensitive attitude and narrowness towards custom and morality.[1][2] The word prude comes from the Old French word prudefemme also prodefemme meaning loyal, respectable or modest woman,
This is what you linked. THIS sounds offensive?
Protip: if a word has a section called 'Perjorative use' on wikipedia, that means it's not a nice thing to call people.
Just prefacing this by saying that I agree that prude is more pejorative than not.
But, in that section of the Wikipedia article you pointed out, there's 3 [citation needed]'s and the citations that are there, are for: two thesaurus', a book of first names, and a paper on translating indecent language.
None of these actually supports your point, because we don't know who wrote that section or why, and they provided no proper sources for their opinions. This is one of the cases where Wikipedia is a bad source when it usually pretty solid.
The dictionary definition shows that today it's only ever used pejoratively:
a person who is excessively proper or modest in speech, conduct, dress, etc.
I have never once heard it used as a descriptor, as that's not how it's used today.
That definition in no way describes the word prude as being pejorative.
And one person's personal anecdotes also doesn't really prove that it's an insult.
Did you not actually read my comment? It was about how the original person was using a bad source to prove their point, which you are also doing.
And to reiterate the very first thing I said, I do in fact believe that the word prude is pejorative. But that is beside the point I've been trying to make. Which is: if you're trying to make a point using sources, make sure they are actually good ones.
Here's an actual source that backs up your point. Of course that's only one source when every other dictionary definition I looked up didn't say either way whether it was insulting.
You really shouldn't let silly things like that trigger you.
It might come off as prudish.
Ah, yes "trigger you" yet more sophistry. You're not here for a discussion, but to win an argument.
I'm just here to converse, crack some jokes, and waste time. I didn't think OP meant anything malicious by using that word, so I stood up for them.
No hate crimes have been committed here today.
Prude today is only ever used pejoratively.
Note excessively.
Don't be disingenuous and you'll have better discussions.
what would be a more neutral term in your eyes?
Ask Lemmy communities need rule against these sorta questions