66
submitted 1 month ago by git@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 67 points 1 month ago

Start with banning above 55s from social media, they’re the ones it’s actually fucking up. I’ve never seen a teenager believe and share AI slop like my in-laws do.

[-] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 63 points 1 month ago

I believe we should ban everyone from social media.

Send post

[-] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago

Unironically I do think we should ban algorithmic social media. Like Hexbear is fine but if content is served over an algorithm it should be banned. Go back to the days of following manually and stuff. Engagement bait dominates now and its rotting peoples brains.

[-] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago

Hexbear also has an algorithm. Upvotes increase visibility, age decreases visibility, posts are weighted by community size etc.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

Return to BBcode forums

[-] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

I don't think sorting is the same as an algorithm. Hot/Top/Controversial/New/Old are specific ways of sorting things. By Algorithmic I meant where they track every click, movement, and pause to decide what to show you next.

[-] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

Sorting the feed is literally what any algorithm is, choosing what content to show when. I think what you’re against is personalised algorithms, but even for algorithms that just prioritise engagement or retention, it could be argued that hexbear’s algorithm does exactly that too. Albeit, not in as sophisticated a manner as say instagrams.

[-] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

OK so let me be more clear:

I am fine with being able to click a button and say "Show me the stuff with the most engagement on the entire site in the last 24 hours" or something like that. Because that is the same for everyone and is just a way to find active discussions. What I am not fine with is where everyones feed is different and determined by specific things being tracked about them. I see it as unhealthy and addictive to the users and as promoting reactionary behavior in society at large.

[-] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

The algorithm should be simple enough that you can write it out and look at it. Hexbears is a clear mathematical formula based on upvotes, comments, time, etc., not a black box that maximizes attention

[-] Sphere@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

https://github.com/hexbear-collective/lemmy/pull/6

That's the Active sort algorithm, which I restored to the original Hexbear Active sort after we merged back to upstream lemmy. See file up.sql for the actual algorithm. It's unfortunately rather difficult to read for those not technically inclined, and kinda hard to understand clearly even for those who can read it. I came to understand it by trying out some basic examples to understand how it worked.

Basically, for several hours after a post, recent comments adjust the time of the post forward to make it come off as more recent, which pushes its rank higher. Right after the post is made, a comment can adjust the post time into the future, maximizing this effect. This effect fades away after several hours, though, such that posts 8 or 9 hours old or older have trouble rising to the top of the feed when competing with newer posts.

[-] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Time traveling posts

[-] imogen_underscore@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

any social media beholden to the profit motive is going to have the same problems. that's the reason hexbear is less shit

[-] Snort_Owl@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

I believe we should ban everyone

you and the other owl will work as carrier pigeons for us to post

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

60 year old British MP texts young female friend: "Skull Island real???"

[-] Keld@hexbear.net 33 points 1 month ago

You have weekly progroms organised on social media by adults Kid Harmer.

The people who are going to remove you from office primary means of getting backing is lying to adults on Facebook.

What are you doing.

[-] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

Using the pretense of protecting kids to install a system that makes as many people as possible identifiable online. ofc he will not use this against mobs of violent fascists, but against anybody calling the genocide in Gaza a genocide, but obviously this entire thing is about political control of social media, it has nothing to do with protecting children on these platforms.

[-] Beaver@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago

Critical support for Kid Starver's policy to indirectly teach tech literacy and problem-solving skills to a new generation by forcing them to circumnavigate technological padlocks.

[-] oliveoil@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

Golden Pathist Kid Starver

this would be cool if it was a step toward a nationwide ban on social media

unfortunately it is not

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
66 points (100.0% liked)

news

24831 readers
830 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS