all 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

The bourgeois want to get a monopoly on sex. They're trying to deprive the people of sex because it develops strong bounds between them. Ancient people knew that warriors were better at war when they fought for the ones they had sex with so soldiers had lots of gay sex. The bourgeois are trying to make the revolution weak by imposing its own bourgeois values on sex : male dominance, procreation-orientedness, non-consensuality, heteronormativity, violence. In one word, as exploiters, they promote exploitative sex. When the proletariat destroys exploitative sex and develops new forms of bounds stronger and healthier between its individuals, class consciousness and collective action power will follow.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Ahh cool cool polyamory is revolutionary got it. (I actually do believe this a little bit)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    If a person can navigate the social minefield of a messy polycule they can also probably do the same thing in a revolutionary org.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Who need their bourgeoisie ate?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    anyone who has more sex than me is bourgeois anyone who has less is an ultra

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    Yes

    It's theft of my precious vital juices

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I think sincerely that sex as a mirror to our society probably reflects a class and gendered characteristic making some sex have reactionary vibes and some progressive to varying degrees.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    [Aella Kink political compass]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    It’s not as fun as I was led to believe.

    I’m not sure if that makes it bourgeois or proletarian.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    only if you're having bouring sex

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    That's the reason my wife gave me for stopping

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
    [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    No. Only women are bourgeois. Extrapolate accordingly.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    On the Chapo sub, one of the most long-running protracted debates was "is cumming bourgeois".

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    only bougies have enough time for sex

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Yeah when the sex is good enough it feels like you rule the world and that's bourgeoisie.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Depends on how much emotional labour you're having someone else do

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago