The bourgeois want to get a monopoly on sex. They're trying to deprive the people of sex because it develops strong bounds between them. Ancient people knew that warriors were better at war when they fought for the ones they had sex with so soldiers had lots of gay sex. The bourgeois are trying to make the revolution weak by imposing its own bourgeois values on sex : male dominance, procreation-orientedness, non-consensuality, heteronormativity, violence. In one word, as exploiters, they promote exploitative sex. When the proletariat destroys exploitative sex and develops new forms of bounds stronger and healthier between its individuals, class consciousness and collective action power will follow.
post
replies:
Who need their bourgeoisie ate?
replies:
replies:
permalink
fedilink
source
parent
hideshow 1 child comment
CW: blood, cannibalism DAMAG3 - BiLLY iN B3LLY 
anyone who has more sex than me is bourgeois anyone who has less is an ultra
I think sincerely that sex as a mirror to our society probably reflects a class and gendered characteristic making some sex have reactionary vibes and some progressive to varying degrees.
replies:
permalink
fedilink
source
parent
hideshow 2 child comments
[Aella Kink political compass]
It’s not as fun as I was led to believe.
I’m not sure if that makes it bourgeois or proletarian.
On the Chapo sub, one of the most long-running protracted debates was "is cumming bourgeois".
Yeah when the sex is good enough it feels like you rule the world and that's bourgeoisie.
all 25 comments