top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 283 points 3 months ago (20 children)

Damn the evil CCCCP and their nefarious plot to *checks notes* tell the truth

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 141 points 3 months ago (16 children)

    The best propaganda is always the truth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Genuinely why I hate anti-america/anti-capitalism propaganda based off lies. You don't need to lie when just telling the truth is damning. The lies just undermine everything when they're exposed, makes people question even the facts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I've said this to people so many times, and they get all up in arms making strawman arguments about how I'm supposedly in favor of the thing they're against.

    Like, no, if I thought you were flat out wrong and I had a differing opinion then I would tell you that. If I critique your argument on the grounds that it weakens itself by relying on misinformation, then chances are I probably agree on the bigger picture.

    Some people, man...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 31 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    The best propaganda is always the truth.

    When they shut down the RT America studio under the foreign agents law and direct TV intervention, they did interviews with the ex-RT dissident-esq reporters who were working there. I don't remember who, and who was interviewing, so take this with a grain of salt. When they were asked on the lines of how they felt working for Russian propaganda and information campaign. They said along the lines of that of all the networks they had worked on, they were never felt as free as when they worked on RT, and they were quite open that it was all part of bringing up narratives that would disrupt the American mainstream ones and create political disruption and doubt. Their handlers in Moscow knew that the best way to achieve this was just to give them reach and mostly uncensored platform and let them do mostly whatever they want, because they knew that just bringing out the truth was the most damaging thing to American establishment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 180 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    "Facts that happened to be true"

    Please, shut the fuck up. Fucking shut the fuck up. I am at the end of my wits with this place.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 142 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    So... So they ran an information campaign?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 133 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    OpenAI has published a report

    Into the trash it goes.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    The real story is not about Chines influence on data center opinion.

    Its openai reading conversations of their customers.

    I mean we all already assumed they do before but this is so blatend, it smells like manufactured consent. You need to go from “suspect it happens” to “its normal to be like this”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 59 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Those evil Chinese propagandists! How dare they… *flips through notes* tell the truth!?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 56 points 3 months ago

    "facts that happen to be true" aka facts

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Their proof is a couple accounts in China asked the chatbot how to convince Americans to not want datacenters in their backyard...

    If I asked a chatbot how to convince someone to not like getting punched in the dick, them not wanting to get punched in the dick doesn't mean there's a grand conspiracy and that's why Bob got mad after being punched in the dick.

    Bob didn't need anyone to tell him not to like getting punched in the dick to have that response.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 45 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Sam Altman seems to be a massive cunt

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Why the fuck make up lies for your propaganda when you dont have to.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    They asked ChatGPT about how to influence Americans views on AI, apparently.

    Sure thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    Imagine how fucking dumb our world has gotten that the discussion is, "china used our specific software to plot the destruction of our specific software using propaganda that accidentally turned out to be true" and not, "company uses VPN to blame China for their shitty practices."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    "Facts that happen to be true" what kind of orwellian speak is this?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    Thanks China

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago*

    PRC ain't good but this is absurd. Fuck ClosedAI

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Wait. So china pointed out why data centers are bad and were right about it and people agreed?

    That's a really weird ass "covert campaign".

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    "These dirty commies! Making everyone woke with their factually correct propaganda! They just want lil ol me to not have my american dream!"

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (15 children)

    Yeah data center bad, but what kills me is the water use thing.

    It really seems to rankle peoples bungle, and in both directions, that yes data-center water use is bad, but its just utterly dwarfed in comparison to forms sources of water use. And this is something I can speak to with a fair bit of expertise, in that I've worked extensively in developing water-use analyses for water districts, cities, counties, states, etc. Its just a scale issue and like with that recent Hank Green video about recycling, people truly don't understand how many people there are.

    For example, take the MAWA equation (mean average water allowance). Typical indoor water allotment (and there is alot of data to back this up) is about 200 gallons (750 liters) per person per residence per day. That includes toilets, showers, cooking, washing clothing etc..

    So lets take the recent number from that NYT article about its data centers water use. I think the number was 2.5 billion gallons?

    73,000 gallons would be the average per-person-per-structure indoor only water allotment, which again, is pretty well established.

    2.5 billion divided by 73k is about 35k, which is a bit of an over estimate but makes no matter.

    All of Amazons datacenters combined "used", and I use "used" lightly here because its not like the water disappeared, but it used less water than a small American town. All of their datacenters combined.

    Using duckduckgo to get numbers on this..

    Just.. put it into context. Say 1lb of beef takes about 2k gallons of water to produce. The average American consumes 50lbs of beef per year. So an average town of say.. 35k people would go through 3.5 billion gallons of water in beef consumption alone, annually.

    And the same equations are going to hold for practically everything else humans consume. Its just... its all a matter of scale. And I agree, datacenters are not good. But the water-use argument is weak when you consider just.. something basic and well established like beef consumption, or golf courses. 2.5 billion gallons is like, 120 golf courses worth of water. Its practically nothing.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    completely agree, always thought the water use argument was weak, we are terrible at internalizing large numbers

    there are way better arguments against datacenters, like the fact that onsite natural gas generators are now the norm for new datacenter builds where the grid can't supply the load needed, those things are fucking terrible for people and the environment

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    I don't think China cares about US that much ngl.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    Another beacon of truth from the company of Sam Altman, known for his honesty and forthrightness

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    OpenAI still acts like there are absolutely none Chinese LLM. Sounds more like a fever dream. I wonder if they also did the exact checks on American user accounts and I am quite certain you will also see hundreds of Americans prompting the same thing.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    Ugh, people with those pesky facts, very inconvenient! /s

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Fun Fact: the American Govt. has okay'ed giving China GPU's now that they get a cut of the profits. 🙄

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    I think this just shows that it's not stopping. They can say the most ridiculous statements in their defense and everyone just moves on.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    We need a radio free America paid for by the Chinese.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›