Wow, the Pacific Ocean must be really wide, like, that's gotta be longer than 2 football fields placed end to end.
post
Ah yes, the optimal packing of 16 Polands
If you put them too close to each other, Russia will try to invade. They're drawn to it sorta like a magnetic Poland field. Once you have too many Poland's, it's best to play it safe.
But 17, probably not.
How do you sink a Polish battleship?
By placing the entire country of Poland into the Pacific Ocean while the Battleship is in drydock.
We haven't found the upper limit yet, but with more research funding we can get closer
There's an old mexican comedy show where the teacher asks a student how many centimeters are in a meter - she answers something like "29. And there's even room for more!"
I like how they started to make a grid then just went "fuck it" lol
If you think that’s bad, wait until they try to fit 17!

Isn’t the garbage island like the size of at least three Polands these days? At some point it’s going to accumulate enough organic debris to develop its own topsoil and eventually ecosystem.
It's not really an island though. There's just more garbage there than elsewhere.
Despite the common public perception of the patch existing as giant islands of floating garbage, its low density (4 particles per cubic metre (3.1/yd3)) prevents detection by satellite imagery, or even by casual boaters or divers in the area.
The Atlantic Ocean can hold 17 Polands. Therefore, the Atlantic Ocean is bigger.
Americans will use anything but metric
You see, Texas wouldn't fit even once, because it's twice the size of the earth. Europeans will never understand that.
Modelled on a mercator projection which doesn't preserve area, then showing exactly the same size on every latitude
Not true. This is a screenshot taken from https://thetruesize.com/, which addresses the issue you mention. You can see, for example, that the yellow outline of poland is larger than the cyan one nearer the equator.
Here's one I did myself to better illustrate that effect:

The Pacific ocean has a surface area of approximately 165 million square kilometres, and poland is about 300,000 square kilometres, so on that basis, you should be able to squeeze around 550 polands into the Pacific, though poorly fitting edges would obviously reduce that, but suffice to say, 16 is well undercounted, and the image accurately portrays that
No, it clearly says you can fit 16 poland in the Pacific, not more
You can fit 16 polands into that area. OP doesn't make any claim that you can only fit 16.
Yeah but we only have 16 Poland in stock
Those three Polands are conspiring against the other 13!
16!
It's not wrong.
The Pacific Ocean is so vast in area it could hold 528 Polands.
The Pacific Ocean is also deep... Can we start stacking the Polands?
1 poland is 2500,8m tall fyi
Thanks. Useful information.
So since the mean depth of the Pacific's around 4000m, that means, without squishing them, we cannot even fit two layers. If we flip the top layer upside down, we should manage to match the tallest bits with lower bits, and fit them beneath sea level. ... since that top one's upside down now, and staying under sea level would be an arbitrary extra restriction I'd be imposing on myself, we can scrap that arbitrary restriction, and use that upturned flat cut underbelly to plonk a third ontop...
But that's still not as many stacked as I thought.
The pacific's tiny.
It can only hold about 1582 Polands.
It can't hold 16! Polands, you're exaggerating
*clicks fingers and points*
Not deep enough.
Right.
Should have known.
Poles.
Tall.
And this is why poland should be the standard unit of measurement.
I've often thought about Poland and the pacific ocean. I always considered you could fit 7 or 8 or 173 or even 9. But 16? That really is mind blowing.
yeah, but one of those polands is so vast it can hold texas lovingly and tenderly

top 50 comments