322
Robbed (thelemmy.club)
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 minutes ago

I'm confused, you aren't the horny poster.

[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 1 points 46 minutes ago

Excellent shitpost lol

[-] socsa@piefed.social 33 points 16 hours ago

The saddest thing about the story of Jesus is that he never got to see Margot Robbie's extremely hairy armpits.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 32 points 17 hours ago

I stopped shaving mine years ago because it seemed like I was developing an intolerance to every razor blade.

I told people it was cause I am a feminist.

I also was sorely disappointed in what grew in.

My whole life I thought if I let it go natural I'd have this majestic thick black beard under there. Something to be proud of, you know?

However after it grew in, it's a medium brown. And the hair is actually kind of fine and fluffy. And not dense. And

I guess this is the feeling men have when they try to grow a beard and find out they are one of the ones who can't do a decent job of it.

I wanted something to make people uncomfortable. To challenge their preconceived notions of womanhood.

Instead it just looks like I have a little brown, thin, soul patch under there.

Very sad.

Not even worth going sleeveless for.

[-] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago
[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

I guess this is the feeling men have when they try to grow a beard and find out they are one of the ones who can't do a decent job of it.

😭😭😭 yes

[-] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

Feeling personally attacked?

[-] li_666@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

🤣🤣🤣😂😂

[-] Impound4017@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago

FWIW I’m amab and I have a similar soul patch of armpit hair, so you’re at least at parity with a dude. Just the way it be sometimes 😭

I also can’t grow facial hair, but that’s a separate question

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 9 points 15 hours ago

Same reason most men shave haha

[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago

I wonder if it gets thicker as you get older, the way beards do? Beard hair doesn't just start up, it gets thicker over time.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Well I'm 40. I can say ,in general, i seem to be becoming less hairy as I get older.

Hair only grows on front calf parts of my legs now. None on my toes like it used to. I asked around And my lady friends my age and older say they have experienced that too.

My guy friends say they are pretty sure they are getting hairier. Apparently ear hair is a thing they struggle with now.

[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Front calves are shins but I like it.

RELEASE THE ARMPIT CUT

[-] RavuAlHemio@lemmy.world 128 points 23 hours ago

How the hell could they even make a final cut when they didn’t have razors?

[-] evening_push579@feddit.nu 52 points 23 hours ago

The door is there dad

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago

Appreciate the humor but of course razors existed in those days. The cutthroat kind at least.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 20 points 18 hours ago

...

Can.... Can I see them?

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 9 points 17 hours ago

Just my own personal opinion: there’s such a thing as too much authenticity.

[-] Aneb@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago

Should I tell you that women naturally have hair on their armpits

[-] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 11 points 15 hours ago

gp comment knows that, they were saying that sometimes such authenticity can be excessive. For example crooked teeth was also much more common back then, but we aren't rallying for studios to start adding CGI crooked teeth

[-] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

God, no. Prosthetics of course.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 9 points 16 hours ago

I’m an older American, and in some ways a product of my times. Many of us were heavily influenced to find women’s armpit hair unattractive. I know, and respect, that others feel differently. Hence, “just my own personal opinion”.

[-] PopcornPrincess@lemmy.world 32 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Come back to Lemmy @MargotRobbie@lemmy.world

PS: based title OP

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 15 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Since it was important to the director for accuracy, did Margot take the time to grow them out, or might they have used the equivalent of merkins? And if so do such things have a separate name? (Edited for spelling)

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 7 points 18 hours ago

One of my favorite insults is to call someone a merkin

[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

I think I'm going to start doing this as well.

[-] texture@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago
[-] restingOface@quokk.au 53 points 22 hours ago

It's called a shitpost, mom. All the cool kids are doing it.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The Wuthering Heights director Emerald Fennell said it was “unfortunate” that a scene showing Margot Robbie’s hairy armpits did not make the final cut, because women in period adaptations are often shown with clean-shaven underarms.

Robbie’s character, Cathy, had “extremely hairy armpits” in the 2026 adaptation of the novel, but “unfortunately the scene that we see them didn’t make it in there”, said the director.

Cathy having unshaven pits “was so important to me”, she said, adding that she often wonders “where are the razors that these women are using?” when watching Jane Austen adaptations.

“They’re all kind of hairless like eels. I’m like: ‘What’s going on? It’s completely mad.’”

I think something pretty normal and understandable that people – who are used to being bombarded by other, very vocal, people's paraphilias online – will immediately and erroneously assume is something sexual.

[-] texture@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

yeah id have just assumed the hair didnt make the final cut bc patriarchal bullshit. i dont see how this is a shitpost so much as just a shitty thing that happened? i figure we judge and control women's bodies more than enough day to day that we dont really need it in the shitpost sub. idk, just struck a cord with me this time i guess.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

You're just assuming that (practically unfalsifiably) when the director suggests nothing of the sort, when footage gets cut from movies literally all the time for every reason under the Sun, and when there's shit in that movie an order of magnitude more provocative (see: the skin room) than a woman with hairy armpits (let alone historically accurately).

[-] texture@lemmy.world -2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

yeah thats why i said "id just assume" not "i think"

also, youre really mixing up provocative with patriarchal and thats unfortunate.

anyway, simple misunderstanding. cheers

edit - my issue isnt with the decision or the details as they are given, its of this being a post in a sub i love. i'll edit my comment to say "id have just"

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

"I'd just assume" unprompted is functionally the same as "I think"; nobody first asked you "well if you had to assume, what would've happened?" We're all adults here; we all understand what words mean.

And I used "provocative" because you're directly implying a form of patriarchical censorship for inherently one of two reasons or some combination: the patriarchical system 1) thinks it's too provocative or 2) thinks it's too superfluous, and (2) isn't per se patriarchy; reasonable minds can differ on whether the scene merited inclusion. I'm sure it wasn't like that scene from The Room where they make a big deal out of Mark's clean-shaven face; I'm sure the protein filaments growing out of Robbie's armpits weren't the nominal objective of the scene. Thus I assumed you were referring to the only one that's strictly, inherently patriarchical for which there wouldn't be a more plausible explanation.

[-] texture@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago

those phrases aren't functionally the same. anyways i already edited my original comment for clarity.

im not reading all that.

[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 40 minutes ago
[-] sundray@lemmus.org 3 points 19 hours ago
this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
322 points (98.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39976 readers
3245 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS