-21
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MastKalandar@feddit.online to c/europe@feddit.org

Do watch this video.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago

If you won't post the video properly, I won't watch it.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online -1 points 1 day ago

You can simply click on the play button.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Nice one, your reply to me here came after you changed where the video was uploaded and edited the link, yet your reply mentioned nothing about that fact.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 2 points 1 day ago

I thought that sharing the video is far more important.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

If you just had made a quick note on the OP saying:

"EDIT: video host changed as requested"

Or something similar.

And added a note in the reply to my comment saying something like:

"Hey, I changed the video host, you should be able to view it now!"

I would have been fine, as it stands now, you hid the fact that you changed the link, which borders on gaslighting.


It is common etiquette to add an EDIT tag with a summary of changes made to post when major changes happens.

It makes for clear communication and can clear up mistakes.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks for explaining it so nicely. I wasn't aware about all this. When you pointed out today morning that you don't want to open an unknown link, which actually directed to my Google drive, l uploaded the video on my peer tube handle and then shared the link.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am sorry I came of as abrasive, I have been on online forums since the early 2000s, and picked up some useful habits over the years.

One that applies here is to mark edits clearly, especially if they are major edits and made after the conversation has started.

Sadly I have also picked up some bad ones, where I forget that not everyone has had the same time online and picked up the same habits.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 3 points 1 day ago

I haven't spent a very long time online, so not aware that such minor things do matter.

You definitely deserve a thanks for your patience, and for pointing it out so flatly.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

I'm afraid to click on this Google Drive link. :D

[-] Fleppensteijn@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

I don't really understand all the downvotes because it seems plausible. Barely anyone uses cash right now so governments make new rules to legally restrict cash.

By the time they start tracking and controlling all your digital spending, you will have lost the option to return to using cash.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly so !

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Other comments mention the post being a google drive link, so ig it was later changed to peertube

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Exactly, and OP never mentioned the change which is bad, it causes confusion and borders on gaslighting when it comes to such a major change.

Common etiquette is to mention a big update like that, had OP done that at the time it would have been fine, but they didn't and now I am annoyed at a major silent change that changes how the replies in the thread appear.

EDIT: Spelling

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

The downvotes came from when OP posted a random Google drive link instead of selecting a proper host for the video. OP then quietly changed the link.

The downvotes mostly came from the bad hosting of a video, and are still deserved as OP never mentioned that they changed the video host, which is bad.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

FYl, the google drive link is not random but leads to the video in my storage.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

That is the point of a GD link, it leads to a file in someone's storage on GD, the point is that it could point to any kind of file, and as a random reader, I have no way of identifying the content before accessing it.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 3 points 1 day ago

Thanks for pointing out my mistake. This is the fediverse, and l've got to be more open.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sad that this is downvoted IMO, seems like an issue we should be more aware of.
And here in Denmark we have very definitely gone far regarding going cashless.
Almost nobody pays cash anymore, and cash payments of more than €2500 are now illegal to prevent money laundering and drug trade.
Exactly as she says.

Of course we want European alternatives to Visa and Mastercard, but when we are forced to use digital currencies because they can be tracked more easily, which is exactly the case here in Denmark, we could end up having privacy issues, and excessive control of how we spend our money.

[-] redlemace@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Hi neighbor!

In Sweden especially restaurants tends to be cash-less only. While cash is still possible in supermarkets etc, i see most digital payments. I do have some 'emergency' cash but Can't remember the last time I paid in cash. (Don't miss all that loose change).

As soon as an european alternetive for visa / mastercard is available I'll swap

[-] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 21 hours ago

Is that legal? Doesn't the government enforce businesses to accept legal money?

On the other hand, last time there was a long blackout I was quite happy to have cash.

[-] redlemace@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Is that legal?

Never looked it up but Given the scale it's happening, I say yes, it's legal. It's even quite common in stores to see only one register accepting cash & card while all others only take cards.

[-] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 20 hours ago

I mean, I guess as long as one counter does accept cash that should be ok, but rejecting cash should be illegal.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

As soon as an european alternetive for visa / mastercard is available I’ll swap

Absolutely, this can't happen soon enough.
Cash is still legal tender here, meaning they have to be able to take it in supermarkets.
However I think there must have been a change to the law, because the new chargers for Electric cars cannot take cash, and that would have been illegal a few years ago.
You can only pay with card or phone.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

That means they're going to do away with liquid € by the end of this year ?

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

IDK what you mean by liquid €?
AFAIK EU is determined to have a digital Euro payment system soon, I assume all EU countries can use that.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 2 points 1 day ago
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

No that is not currently possible. The Scandinavian countries could do it, but most of the rest of EU cannot, because they don't have a solid enough infrastructure to not have old fashioned cash.

When we talk cash here, we mean physical cash as in non digital payments.
But even though EU as a whole isn't ready to go cashless yet, they can still make limitations on cash payments like the ones we have here in Denmark.
And that can be used to increase national oversight of how money is being used.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

I've got quite a few videos on such topics.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 2 points 1 day ago

Going off topic : while people in my place are crazy about Brazilian football, or Messi or Argentina, personally l love the Nordic teams when it comes to football. My town had been a French colony, while a neighbouring town had been Danish.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not a football fan, or a fan of any sport. But I do know that here Argentina is very highly regarded as a leading football nation.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

Denmark Sweden play far better football.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Wow, I'm surprised you think so, I thought Brazil and Argentina were better. But again, it's not something I really follow. When I was a child in the 70's, Denmark was "røven a fjerde division." a very impolite way of saying we sucked very very badly. The ass (bottom) of the fourth league. And Sweden was way better than us.
then a plan was made in the Danish football league, that we needed to make professional football legal, and build the top league around professional teams like they had in for instance UK.
That paid off already in 1984 where Denmark reached the semi final in the European championship. A previously completely unheard of result for the national team. Where in the 70's I doubt we ever even qualified to participate.
I still remember some of the names of the Danish national team from back then, and that we lost to France.
8 years later we actually won the European championship over Germany, ironically during very tough negotiations in EU, because Denmark had voted no to a new treaty.
Our foreign minister even saw the match together with the German delegation, and the smirk on his face when he came out after was priceless. And he said: "If you can't join them, beat them!"
I can't overstate how much of a sensation it was for us to win the European championship, as a very small country against many countries with 20 times as much money and talent to pull from.

Those were good times. 😎 😀 😋 🎉

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was born in 1984. And when Denmark lost to Australia in 2022 World Cup, l stopped watching football.

The Danish footballers are some of the fiercest footballers in the world.

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

Do you mean something digital ?

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 2 points 1 day ago

So you're from Scandinavia ? No matter where you are, if we don't stand up for our rights, we're utterly screwed up.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 2 points 1 day ago

We'll agree on many things. I feel that we agree more than we disagree.

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

The link is not accessible, so I will not watch it

[-] MastKalandar@feddit.online 0 points 1 day ago

The link is very much working.

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

Your changed it. And it seems you are not very transparent about it.

Before, it was just a protected Google drive link. When trying to open it I got a message where I had to request access.

this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
-21 points (23.1% liked)

Europe

11217 readers
410 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS