281
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The US also has huge trade deficits in mangoes and sports shoes. So what?

Only idiots like Trump think all bilateral trade flows should balance.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Sure they do. It’s double down on ICE and block the import of foreign EV.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Well, we've artificially inflated the price of steel, electronics and consumable resources like fuel and electricity required to build cars in the US. I can't imagine that we would even be competitive building anything right now.

[-] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Don't forget years of short sighted manufacturing enabled by the insane dealership system.

And, I guess enough research and development to realize that you're a decade or so behind the competition.

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

I got an answer, give up and let the Chinese EVs in. or just reinvent public transportation for the future and stop wasting ungodly amount of resources for Ford F-150s everywhere

[-] innermachine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

If we let the Chinese evs in they would out sell too many ice or hybrid cars and reduce our consumption of oil, as well as bring too much competition to our "free" market. We can't have that, think of all the money spent in lobbying to keep us dependent on oil! And people might not buy electric cars from their favourite eccentric Nazi if there's an alternative and that absolutely cannot fly! Ugh it's the same story over and over again with American companies. Perform like dog shit, piss and moan that sales are tough because of those pesky foreign doing it better, tarrifs the competition out of competition and beg big govt for a nice bail out. Been happening over and over since at least the 60s in at least automotive industry. People who use USA as an example of capitalism = bad are totally missing the point that USA is socialism for rich people at the expense of capitalism, as a real capitalist would love to buy BYD in USA. Capitalism needs to be constrained with regulation sure, but not in a way that benefits your "representatives" favourite private corpo

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Amen to all of that.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago

US won't have an answer. Obama invested in battery research, Trump shut it down, Biden invested in battery manufacture, Trump shut it down. During this time, Chinese industry secured a supply chain from raw ore mining to making batteries with patents. US has no IP in batteries.

Same thing is happening with drug discovery, it's all China for the next decade.

[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 12 points 2 days ago

Seems like the simple solution is to buy their cars and focus on producing something else.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 88 points 3 days ago

This is what happens when you let the oil industry and their lobbyists have unfettered control of the narrative and legislation .You get a huge number of politicians falling into their pockets, and progress is stymied at every turn.

It's actually kind of surprising America has made the limited progress on EVs that we have. But it's nowhere near enough. And now we are paying the piper.

[-] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

American voters are doing their part to "help," crying about "high" fuel prices (less than half of what they are here) when one of the big issues is that undertaxation of petrol has led to underinvestment in alternatives.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

SHOCKING REVELATION: US lacks clue

[-] sanitation@lemmy.radio 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's over tbh. U can be a genius with 50 phds this trajectory was like this for decades

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 58 points 3 days ago

The headline suggests it’s a problem that the USA is working on. Evidence suggests that in fact the approach being taken is to imitate an ostrich, and bury the collective head in oil and gas money.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

sure it does.

shitting your pants has worked out well so far, just keep doing that.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

The US government is falling all over itself to fellate the oil and gas industry to protect their profits. They have blocked EVs in every way possible.

China doesn't give a fuck about the US Church of Profits and is building renewable energy and EVs faster than the rest of the world combined.

The west has already lost. China won. China will be in charge in the very near future.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

They are just as profit-driven as US corporations are. They are also leading the world in coal mining.

And I remember people singing the same song about Japan in the late 70s as they do about China now. Extrapolation works perfectly in a world with no limiting factors.

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 5 points 2 days ago

Fuck it, at this point lets give China a shot. They have issues, lots of them, but Europe isn't going to compete any time soon, and at least China doesn't switch between telling you you're friends, and stabbing you in the back every 4-8 years.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If by "the U.S." you mean Bonespurs, not having answers goes without saying. But that aberration won't keep wasting oxygen forever.

[-] dasrael@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Oh It does... They prevent China EV makers from partaking in their "free market" and force you domestic suckers to keep slurping up the status-quo.

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 7 points 2 days ago

The solution is putting their fingers in their ears, screaming "No one wants EVs anyway" "America no1!" "USA! USA! USA!".

You know, same solution they've always used.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago

Of course not, the current US government is actively hostile toward EVs and green energy. Why do all these headlines frame this as if it's so surprising?

US: shoots itself in the foot "WHY ISN'T CHINA LIMPING AS HARD AS I AM?!?!?!?"

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This article wont go away

[-] jobbies@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Was a loyal Ford (european) customer but I don't want an SUV version of the mustang, a massive truck or whatever the new 'Capri' is (its not a Capri).

And why are they all so ugly??

Wtf happened to Ford??

[-] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Ford seems to be taking from Tesla's design language and trying to mix it with their own and the results are really fucking ugly

[-] jobbies@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Its awful. Its like they cut their design team and got AI to do the work instead.

Now I think about it I wouldn't be surprised if thats actually what happened. But instead of just car design it was their whole product strategy.

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 20 points 3 days ago

The answer continues to be: do everything it can to ignore China exists, and insulate the industry from having to compete.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

How very free market of them. Seems like it would be so shitty to be a real republican - their party has totally abandoned those ideals.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 19 points 3 days ago

I'm sure his answer will be tariffs because he's not about to invade China for their oil.

[-] stickly@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Setting aside fascism, the solution is expanded train infrastructure.

People in here are talking about battery IP but that's not as important as simple BEV production capacity. An EV is dead simple mechanically but you've gotta have the raw resources and factories to keep up. Even then, the US would need to do some major infrastructure upgrades to support a bunch of heavy and plug-hungry EVs.

Trains are a big investment but getting track laid and a few hundred thousand running is much more manageable than trying to replace ~280 million ICE vehicles (97.9% of all US vehicles in 2023).

I predict China is going to feel the same car dependence pain in a few decades if they continue to ramp production and climb the cars-per-capita leader board. It's crazy expensive to keep millions of people puttering around in multi-ton metal boxes.

I predict China is going to feel the same car dependence pain in a few decades if they continue to ramp production and climb the cars-per-capita leader board. It's crazy expensive to keep millions of people puttering around in multi-ton metal boxes.

Ahh I don't think they're going the way of the US in that regards:

Wikipedia data is a little old, but...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_China

"China's railways are the busiest in the world. In 2019, railways in China delivered 3.660 billion passenger trips, generating 1,470.66 billion passenger-kilometres and carried 4.389 billion tonnes of freight, generating 3,018 billion cargo tonne-kilometres.[1] Freight traffic turnover has increased more than fivefold over the period 1980–2013 and passenger traffic turnover has increased more than sevenfold over the same period.[10] During the five years 2016–2020, China's railway network handled 14.9 billion passenger trips, 9 billion of which were completed by bullet trains, the remaining 5.9 billion by conventional rail. "

This is the Chinese govt site

https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/statistics/202506/06/content_WS6842d8f6c6d0868f4e8f31d9.html

"China's railway system transported more than 4.31 billion passengers in 2024, up 11.9 percent year on year, according to the National Railway Administration.

Railway cargo transportation volume approached 5.18 billion tonnes last year, reflecting a 2.8-percent growth compared to the previous year.

In terms of investment, China's railway sector saw fixed-asset investment amount to 850.6 billion yuan (around 118.39 billion U.S. dollars) in 2024. During the same period, 3,113 km of new railway lines were inaugurated, about 79 percent of which are high-speed railways.

As the modern railway network continued to expand, China's total operational length of lines reached 162,000 km in 2024, including over 48,000 km of high-speed railway lines.

Furthermore, railway transportation remained safe, stable, and orderly throughout 2024, with no severe railway traffic accidents in China, the administration added."

TL;DR They're doing plenty of rail

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

I got to ride in a Li Auotmotive i9 Ultra the other day and it was amazing. Ridiculously luxurious and far ahead of tesla. Cheaper too. It had a fridge and microwave, and big screens everywhere. Its Lidar view of everything around the car was vastly superior to Tesla's, and it has about 15x the computing power of my model 3.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Greed, bad organization, bad design, too costly, invasive of owner's data, friends in the oil biz. Those are some answers, but not all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

No, our answer is that EVs are dumb and that oil is the only energy source that matters in this century and every century to come.

[-] P1k1e@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Make decent vehicles that don't spy on people or track them.....fucking morons

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The answer for what? Is clear that the current policy is short term gains in selling huge overpowered gas trucks that are impossible to sell in the rest of the world, leave door open for Chinese EV, disappear into irrelevance in long term

[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

Whenever the US car industry seems to be moving towards EVs a major correction takes place and more huge vehicles appear instead. They obviously aren’t serious and will go the way of the buggy whip if they can’t replace management with people who can plan for the long term.

[-] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

I want those Chinese EVs so bad 😭

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

They sell them in my country.

What I'd love to see is some multi-year reliabiity data on them. Initial product quality looks pretty good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sanitation@lemmy.radio 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's kind of 30th trimester. Too late for abortion Steve - China domnitates and we have no answer

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 10 points 3 days ago

The USA isn't exactly known for their cars. But even Germany has trouble making good cars nowadays.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
281 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

84830 readers
4223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS