I have noticed that much of the criticism towards organisations such as the A'C'P is focused on their ideological 'basis' (LaRouche, Dugin, Schmitt, Heidegger, etc.) not only of Hammoud's and Hinkle's but the entire 'party', and also their blatant tailism (I suggest you to read this interesting autopsy of this aspect). There are also Hammoud's immaturity and their members' homophobia, transphobia, misogyny, etc.

However, I have noticed that Hinkle, Carlos Garrido, and others present a different mask when they go abroad. Garrido in particular behaves quite differently when talking to people outside of the US from what we could expect from their plenary committee such as Hinkle spewing his reactionary rhetoric with Fresh & Fit or Tucker Carlson. Hinkle, also, has had quite the amount of meetings with anti-imperialists for some reason.

So, inspired by this excellent post from the TankieTheDeprogram sub on reddit, I would like to know how to tackle this aspect not only of the A'C'P's but also other figures like George Galloway and the Workers Party of Britain and who knows what other organisations who use internationalism, anti-imperialism, support for Palestine and AES to mask their fascism.

Cheers