all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 63 points 4 months ago

And where did that bring you? Back to me

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 4 months ago
    [–] 55 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    If you cared to hear his full speech, he made it very clear that while he is not going to provide city-funded bisexual girlfriends, he's going to be the bisexual boyfriend to whoever wants him, please provide his full speech instead of just cherry-picking quotes out of context. Be better.

  • source
  • [–] 54 points 4 months ago

    In typical democrat fashion, he's going to provide bicurious boyfriends to everyone who's ran a small business in an impoverished neighborhood for five years

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 4 months ago

    Sigh* see this is why electorialism is a dead end.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 4 months ago

    We can't keep letting fake leftists confound us like this!

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 4 months ago

    It's because he's providing queer enby polycules instead. He's just that based

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    There aren't enough bisexual girlfriends for everyone.

    Unless...

    "I have a suggestion"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 4 months ago
    [–] 31 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    He's exacting his revenge for not getting with that ethereal bisexual back in college.

    The reference

    Looking back, it’s embarrassing to recognize the degree to which my intellectual curiosity those first two years of college paralleled the interests of various women I was attempting to get to know: Marx and Marcuse so I had something to say to the long-legged socialist who lived in my dorm; Fanon and Gwendolyn Brooks for the smooth-skinned sociology major who never gave me a second look; Foucault and Woolf for the ethereal bisexual who wore mostly black. As a strategy for picking up girls, my pseudo-intellectualism proved mostly worthless; I found myself in a series of affectionate but chaste friendships.

    –Barack Obama, A Promised Land, Chapter 1

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago

    !electoralism in shambles

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago

    What zero materialism does to a motherfucker. Sad.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago

    Tough, but fair

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago
    [–] 7 points 4 months ago
    [–] 7 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    This is clearly a joke. If someone wanted to sincerely critique mamdani, there are very recent things to discuss

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Why are you replying this to me? I just think it's misleading that Pamphlets tweet says "breaking" when it happened 6 months ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    I misunderstood the direction of your critique, pamphlets is being misleading if they were being sincere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    An example is that the Pamphlets account often posts fake things about DPRK and Kim Jong Un. Pamphlets account had posted that DPRK had captured 2 suspected Israeli spies and executed them. This would have been a cool thing, but it did not happen. I searched KCNA, Rodong Sinmun, etc and there was no article. There was also no article in western media.

    It might be a joke, but I saw many people believing that it was a real thing. Sometimes the Pamphlets account posts real stories. Sometimes the Pamphlets account post fake stories. I'm just saying if you see something interesting on that account, verify it by a reliable source. And if people want to learn about DPRK, they should read KCNA or Rodong Sinmun.

  • source
  • parent