1
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Scholastic found that it either had to give in to the hardliners who wanted to ban books for children or to not allow that, and they seem to have decided to give in.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

In the regions that have banned or will ban books legislatively but still ironically hold book fairs, scholastic is letting the schools themselves decide which books to display, rather than including the books in the book fair shipments without notifying the schools first.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's exactly this. Teachers are getting arrested over books. Do you want book fairs to end completely because a teacher won't run it because they're afraid a "bad book" might show up and it would be blamed on them?

This is a GOOD thing. Go after the shitty politicians, not Scholastic trying to accommodate this bullshit.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

They could have at least made this "controversial" collection of books opt-out instead of opt-in.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Opt in makes it less likely a teacher orders it by accident. And they called it things like "stories of inclusivity". It's pretty on the nose that they support these books and are calling out those who wouldn't as being "uninclusive".

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Banned Book Club

882 readers
1 users here now

Community dedicated to discussion of banned and challenged books.

ALA Advocacy Page

Banned Books Week

The Palace Project

Please follow this instances rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS