this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
420 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3814 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

House Speaker Mike Johnson has three flags hanging outside his office: the American flag, the Louisiana state flag, and a flag representing a movement that wants to turn the United States into a religious Christian nation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 195 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, it might have something to do with the fact that Mike Johnson is a christian nationalist that wants to turn the United States into a christofascist state.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Now, now, let's not go jumping to conclusions just because they happen to be based on facts and logic.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

and the evidence, let's not forget the evidence.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Hold up there, buddy. That sounds like some of that critical thinking stuff the filthy demonrats keep going on about. We will not stand for that in a God fearing nation!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Get outta here. Feelings don't care about your facts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Also, if the conclusion is correct, it's because the mean old "liberal media" and the "Democrat Party(sic)" called them Republicans like Mike names like fascist and racist and xenophobic and so on, and that is why they had to turn to this! See what you made them do?!!!

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The answer is in the question.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

This headline and article are begging to be in c/NotTheOnion, yeah.

Screams:
My Christian nationalist flag has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my flag.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like that the Republican answer to losing elections is to double down on the religious crazy and ramp up the purity testing. All of that just makes it even easier to win elections against them.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't celebrate too soon. Thanks to gerrymandering, voter suppression and an unpopular Dem president, they still have a chance to retain the house and maybe even retake the Senate no matter how batshit crazy they get.

I'm not saying it's likely, I'm just saying that the risk is never zero and celebrating too soon increases that risk 🤷

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, republicans will quite likely take the senate in the next cycle. With Manchin retiring, WV is essentially a republican lock. More broadly, Democrats are defending 20 seats to 11 for republicans, and the lowest hanging fruit for democratic pickups would be Rick Scott (FL) or Ted Cruz (TX), and as much as they both suck, that's still going to be tough.

So, just to retain their slim margin, they'd have to defend all of their other seats and knock off one of those two.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The US is fucked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Off-topic, but whenever I see someone mention Ted Cruz it reminds me of his website advertising his presidential campaign: https://www.tedcruzforhumanpresident.com/

It's funny, you gotta check it out!

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why is it that the article is about this flag, but doesn't have a picture of the flag. This is more upsetting than it should be.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Exactly my thought. Entire point of the article is a flag outside his office. The article does not contain a picture of said flag, none of the links in the article that I have followed contain pictures of said flag.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol was it made in MS paint 😂

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, probably whatever version of MS paint was available in 1775. It must have been even worse than modern version of paint.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_Tree_Flag

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The Tree Flag (or the Appeal to Heaven Flag) was one of the flags used during the American Revolution.

Huh

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Probably because the flag looks like a toddler made it and it's not intimidating at all even though the implications behind it are very serious.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Seriously, this is journalistic malpractice. If it’s right outside the guys office then it should be easy enough to take a photo. I don’t need a flag to know this guy is bad news but I’m not gonna jump on the outrage wagon over an article with no photo.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because he can't get away with flying a confederate or nazi flag?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For anyone looking for the picture:

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We really need to start charging elected representatives with perjury when they blatantly violate the oath of office like this.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Violating the oath of office is a seperate crime, carrying stiffer penalties than perjury.

The Dems would never have the guts to enforce it no matter what, though, and the SCOTUS has a Christofascist majority itself.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_Tree_Flag

I'd never heard of it.

Very funny for the religious right to be appropriating Locke quotes and Iroquois symbolism.

The Locke quotes reminds me of the Chinese concept of the "mandate of heaven", but more populist

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That tree looks like it would make a nice cozy fire.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This looks like it was done in Ms paint

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

He's flying a Christian nationalist flag because he's a Christian nationalist. Maya Angelou - "When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time."

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I bet anything this guy has some very weird skeletons in his closet. Like, he runs that weird xtian software on most of his devices, but there is some computer in his house that has weird/illegal content on it, and doesn't have the Jesusy spyware on that computer...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Hah! Same thing I thought. Probably has a stash from years ago that he refuses to throw out.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I must admit I did not-c that one coming.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

"Why are these cockroaches under this rock?!"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Even Jesus thinks this guy is weird as fuck.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

This is gonna have Mike Pence.level.of weirdness

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Why do bears shit in the woods?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As much as I'd like to say that religious nuttery should bar people from office:

Constitution, Article VI:

“no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” 

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fine, but let's look at all of that section of Article VI:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Bound by oath to support the Constitution, but no religious test required to assume that duty. Ok cool. Your duty as a government official is to the Constitution, not to your religion, and your religion is immaterial -- and this is key -- provided you uphold the Constitution.

Now let's look at the "establishments clause" of the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

If you will not uphold the First Amendment's establishments clause, if you are scheming to establish a Christian theocracy, you are not supporting the Constitution. If you are not supporting the Constitution, Article VI in fact disqualifies you from public office.

For that matter, you don't even need the First Amendment to make the point. A theocracy would immediately run afoul of Article VI itself, as it would require officials to adhere to the state's church doctrine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Because he's Panzerfaust Pinocchio. Next question.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does the flag have KKK printed on it somewhere?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

No, it's just implied.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Next, he may want the Confederate flag, the Russian flag, and the Neo-Nazi flag hanging outside his office to indicate he wants everyone to vote for his opponent in the next election, and wants Hakeem Jeffries to end up becoming House Speaker instead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was referring to a flag with the Nazi symbol on it like they heil Adolf Hitler.

load more comments
view more: next ›