442
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 146 points 4 months ago

And here I was thinking these blow-and-go contraptions were self contained. I should have known better.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 94 points 4 months ago

They want to be able to remotely disable vehicles, but in the process have made us vulnerable to all sophisticated actors to do so. Our leaders have their priorities all screwed up.

[-] teft@piefed.social 57 points 4 months ago

Once again proving backdoors are fucking idiotic.

[-] Archr@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Not sure that I would really agree that these are backdoor. Since disabling the vehicle remotely is kinda the express intention of this device. Just a consequence of how they designed them to not be circumvented by the operator.

[-] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 months ago

Why is remote access the intention? Should the device not verify the alchohol % locally and then mechanically allow the car to star or not? What part of that needs any form of remote oversight?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 12 points 4 months ago

Since disabling the vehicle remotely is kinda the express intention of this device

Uhhh nope, there's no reason for a remote connection.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 67 points 4 months ago

This is a great story to illuminate the large number of problems that could be addressed by decent public transit, better options for walking and biking, etc.

[-] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 4 months ago

Boo for the cyber attack but fuck people who drive drunk repeatedly to the point of needing an interlock device. Maybe don't drink and drive you fucking sack of shit.

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 33 points 4 months ago

Fuck the lock, ban them from driving. Inexcusable.

[-] iSeth@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 months ago

Perfect solution. Really needs public transit or walkable cities to work so win-win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 13 points 4 months ago

Driving under the influence is a ban able offence (reckless endangerment) in most countries.

So is a proper driver's ed before giving even a learner's permit. US loves giving a multi ton killing machine to untrained people with impulse control. And teenagers

[-] Joelk111@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I agree with you, but the difference is that, in the US, people NEED to be able to drive to function in society. That's why the bar has to be so low to get a license.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ChillCapybara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 months ago

Comments sections. Where nuance goes to die. All context is flattened and your views must be expressed as black or white lest you get branded as having the wrong opinion.

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Amen, Lemmy is in the starting stages of how reddit went my brother. It's inherent to the format

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Not-so hot take: the underlying issue is lack of public transportation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Never knew anyone who had one, but a friend of mine dated a guy who did. He would beg her to breathe into it for him.

[-] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

That's insane but as an alcoholic I can absolutely see someone doing it.

Some are social butterflies who have to be out and about but talk about not learning lessons.

[-] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

“Not learning lessons” is a pretty mild way to put it.

The only way it isn’t pure evil is if we allow that the alcoholic is not in control of their actions. And if we allow that, they cannot be trusted to drive, or really to even have their freedom. They are 5150, plain and simple.

[-] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

They're in control but reaching them is something best done by people like them in my experience.

Logic only goes so far, clearly.

[-] darkkite@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

you only need to get caught once for the lock

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hegseth is gonna be even more angry than ~~born~~ normal when he can't drive from point a to point b because of this.

[-] criss_cross@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

That’s why he lives in the base. So he doesn’t have to admit he got his license revoked.

[-] UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au 6 points 4 months ago

To be fair, I too would be angry had I been born normal.

[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 15 points 4 months ago

How are these people planning to drive? The cost of fuel is excruciating! If it wasn’t because of Operation Epstein Fury, driving may have been an option.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 4 months ago

They just breathe into the gas tank after happy hour.

[-] skulkbane@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Internet connected breathalyzer... May I ask why? If they need periodic recalibrations all of them don't need it right now no?

Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I had one disable my car in rush hour traffic in another city on a roadtrip, they had no way to do anything to get me back up and running. I assume this is for those kinds of cases. I was taking up a lane on the interstate with a cop staring at me, trying to hum the little fucker back to life while a tow truck came.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago

A "cyberattack"? Or vibe coded AI slop running as intended?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
442 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

86683 readers
3112 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS