nuff said

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 391 points 3 years ago (35 children)

With the way he's running this, I'm a bit confused as to why he didn't just buy Truth Social directly. Wouldn't have cost him nearly as much.

  • source
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] [S] 192 points 3 years ago (20 children)

    He bought the users. Elon knows that people are lazy and will not change websites.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 201 points 3 years ago (12 children)

    -50% ad revenue says otherwise

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 108 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    Twitter could have 200% more users, if no one want to show them ads, then ad spots will be dirt cheap. Printing 5 millions of 1cent ads vs 1 million of 10cents ads is not the same. Both on income and expenses...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    This, so much this. I also find it rather coincidental that fb cam out with threads soon after the twitter implosion. Opportunistic feasting on a dead carcass perhaps?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Twitter has been on the outs since musk bought it. If Facebook was smart they'd have started right then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Threads still doesn't have #hashtag searching IIRC. It's missing a huge number of features. It's clear that they only came out as early as they did because they saw an opportunity to eat Twitter's lunch.

    They really needed a few more months of dev time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago

    Bluesky is the same way. There are a lot of features there that still need to be implemented.

    I’m glad Masto at least has hashtags and video and gifs and editing. For me right now it has the best features and the best experience. I’m pretty happy with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 298 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    Remember the 50% number is just what he was comfortable with publishing to the public

    We have no reason to believe his public statistics

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 166 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    100% of the ads I see on Twitter today are dropshipping scams, while in the pre-musk era they were highly targeted to my job and interests to the point that if there wasn't the "ad" tag I couldn't distinguish that.

    They can't cost the same for the advertiser, a generic dropshipping scam that targets everyone must be cheap

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 155 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Wait, the white supremacists and Nazis that he caters to aren’t making up the ad revenue? Well I’ll be!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 153 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Maybe.... I don't know, just throwing ideas out there.... you shouldn't have Musked all over Twitter nor fired its core developers? Again, just thinking out loud....

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Not even just that... Alienates all potential leftwing/brand friendly advertiser's through changes and being the spokesperson for the platform.

    "We're down 50% how could this have happened?????" - Elon Musk

    Dude needs to stfu, make an alt account. He has chosen to be the spokesperson for the platform. Spouting off conspiracies and controversial takes. You can't be surprised nobody wants to associate with him.

    He is a liability and a brand risk. Sure he can have his opinions but here is the problem...

    He has chosen to be extremely public and force those opinions onto the average consumer feed due to his narcissistic tendencies and it is biting him in the ass.

    No sympathy. He wanted free speech, (albeit it isn't because he is okay as long as it doesn't criticise him or his affiliates.) now he has his free speech platform but in the same way advertisers can chose not to engage with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 152 points 3 years ago* (17 children)
    • Your Google search result redirects to Twitter
    • you click and open the link
    • Twitter asks you to login to see the tweet.
    • You close that tab and move on to next search result.

    Best way to avoid traffic to your site, then complain about revenue loss from advertisements.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] 140 points 3 years ago
    [–] 134 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Please don't turn this community into another Musk news ticker.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 101 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Weird, users can't access the site, so ad revenue goes down?? Nobody can blame Elon, that's literally impossible to predict. Maybe if he bans users from tweeting more than once a day it will get better?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 76 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    I'm not waiting to see Twitter fail. I'm just hoping that the federated alternatives for Twitter and Reddit will get more mainstream. And I must say that I'm happy with the way things are evolving at Mastodon and Lemmy.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 73 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Hmm maybe putting in rate limits, thus greatly reducing the amount of time people spend on the app, isn't the best strategy for a platform whose main source of revenue comes from advertising?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 63 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Elon complaining about this just reminds me that he can afford to lose ~50 billion dollars and still be one of the wealthiest people ever to have lived.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 60 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    I remember a fellow saying Elon is a very business savvy person, because of his 2 other successful companies, Tesla and SpaceX. I guess ruining communications with potential advertisers on a platform that depends entirely on advertisers wasn't a very intelligent move.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [+] 60 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (11 children)
    load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 54 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    And no interest in thinking about why they're down ~50% in advertising revenue.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 54 points 3 years ago

    Of course! It's because of Threads! Don't you guys get it? They stole their secrets!! It has absolutely nothing to do with how things are being run on twitter or because Elon Musk is a genius!!!

    Fuck Musk and fuck twitter and all that goes with it.

  • source
  • [–] 54 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Go Fasc, lose cash!

    Fuck you, Musk. Piece of shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 52 points 3 years ago

    So, we still 50% to go. I believe in you, Elon /s

  • source
  • [–] 50 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Aww. That's super duper sad and I am sad for him.

    Anyways.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 48 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 48 points 3 years ago* (10 children)

    The heavy debt load was caused by his purchase... He paid $26 bn, a couple other investors (including a Saudi prince) together paid $5 bn, the remaining $13 bn is a loan Twitter took out to buy itself on Musk's behalf.

    The purchase was always a financial death sentence. Either Twitter steps into line and becomes the propaganda tool he and his old friend Peter Thiel want, then it can have some extra investment, or Twitter dies.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 43 points 3 years ago (29 children)

    Heavy debt load? Where could that have come from.? A leveraged buyout at an overvalued price or something?

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • load more comments (29 replies)
    [–] 40 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Gasp. Who would have thought actively courting Nazis would make risk averse corporations stop using your ads! Poor Elon! Also doesn't help that the site was basic private for a while. I know I never bothered to log in while it was log in only.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 38 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    Nobody is talking about it, but does that advertising exec that Musk hired for CEO take a massive hit to her career for any of this?

    It seems surreal to have a ghost CEO who isn't responsible for anything such a large company does. But that's exactly what's happening here.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 34 points 3 years ago

    Music to my ears

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 3 years ago

    On the other hand, I think the people at Tesla/SpaceX are probably very happy that Elon has his hands full with Twitter right now.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Has he tried not fucking up the platform yet?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 3 years ago (7 children)
    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    lol good.

    Twitter has/is/was always a cesspit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    50% is just what he's admitting to. Not sure how easily that number can be verified, but if someone told me that the actual numbers were much, much worse... I wouldn't bet against them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago

    Let’s see: Alienate the users. Fire everyone who knows how to keep the place running. Fill the site with bots and white supremacists.

    FA complete. FO now underway.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago

    Good. Fuck em

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 3 years ago

    Just shut it down already.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›