Didn’t Texas just say that workers don’t have to be given water breaks?
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
35 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2242 readers
9 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
sure did. however, that law technically doesn't take effect until Sep 1. however, it seems some employers are already taking advantage of it to harm and kill their employees. also important to note that the temperature in much of Texas can still be well above 90F through the end of October, so Sep 1 is not a meaningful date WRT working through the summer - there will likely be many 100F+ days after this law officially begins.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/07/14/texas-houston-worker-protest-water-breaks-law/
Didn’t some red state governor just make it illegal for construction workers to have required rest-and-water breaks? Bad timing…
Great timing, actually. What better way to invoke change than let people get affected by the consequences of their actions?