Summary
Police say King Charles's brother is in custody and officers are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk - read the police statement in full

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 267 points 7 months ago (44 children)

As a British person that's something I thought I'd never see.

Arrested on his birthday too.

  • source
  • hideshow 44 child comments
  • [–] 109 points 7 months ago (23 children)

    The late queen's protection of him was a blemish on her record. I'm happy the king has cut him loose to face consequences..... I wonder if they asked him before the arrest...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] [S] 54 points 7 months ago* (14 children)

    I'm not British but I'm also very surprised. I can't help but wonder if they would have dared had he still had his title?

    on his birthday too.

    The cops took the phrase "the icing on the cake" literally, and I think it was an excellent choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    I can't help but wonder if they would have dared had he still had his title?

    I would assume that the king and other interested parties will have known this was coming for a while and that is why he lost his title.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Maybe, I'm not so sure. I had thought they knew it was very likely the accusations were true, but they spent a lot of time sidestepping action. If public criticism hadn't been so relentless, they might have been content to sweep it under the rug, as is tradition.

    But I have never kept close track of the royal family, largely because I always assumed they were untouchable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    they spent a lot of time sidestepping action

    That's sort of my point though, they spent years protecting him and then suddenly a few months ago something made them turn on a dime and strip him of his titles very rapidly. I suspect that "something" was being told the police had enough evidence to arrest him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago

    Someone asked Ernest Hemingway how he lost all his money.

    "Gradually, then all at once."

    Same situation. One person says something and it's dismissed. Ten people say it and it becomes gossip fodder. A hundred people say it and it becomes an open secret. A million people say it and he gets arrested.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 190 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    As an American I find this confusing to arrest a rich, powerful person on criminal charges.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Especially a rich white person

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 112 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    There is more happening on a global level from the findings in the Epstein files then there is in the US. The US just gets tweets and soundbites on the news. The US is a joke.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Sadly, as I understood from a report I saw this morning, it's not in connection to his pedophilia but to sending highly sensitive gov docs to Epstein which may have been used for financial gain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 75 points 7 months ago (14 children)

    over the alleged sharing of confidential material by the former prince with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein

    Really? Not because he's a sex offender himself maybe? I'm happy to see an arrest, but fucking really!?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Because even in the Epstein files most people aren't saying "ay Jeff, cheers for the fifteen year-old lasses we all shagged, see you next time," but they are saying "here are the minutes of the cabinet meeting/this is what the prime minister thinks about regulating your company/this is the most he's willing to give you a tax break for" in emails because that stuff had to be communicated somehow.

    We can all see that Andrew probably committed some sex crimes. But being a suspicious creepy fucker, being accused, and having a photo of you crouching over a girl would not be enough evidence to get you or me charged with a crime either. The counterweight to "nobody is above the law" is "nobody shall be convicted except on the evidence."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    CPS generally charges what they can reasonably prove.

    *and since he's high profile I expect (hope) they aren't going to fuck it up. get him for something like this, maybe it opens the doors to further charges. Anyway, living in hope.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 52 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    The grand old Duke of York

    he had 12 million quid

    He gave it to someone he’d never met

    for something he never did

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 7 months ago* (4 children)

    I did not expect this.

    Sadly, this proves that even the infamously evil ROYAL FAMILY has more integrity than Trump and our politicians (including Democrats).

    Which is fucking terrifying, really. Brace yourselves, keep your chin up, and all of that

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    This should put enough pressure for Trump to be next, right my US American fiends?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 33 points 7 months ago (16 children)

    Funny how I knew it wasn't in America not because of the name, but because someone in public office went into custody.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    He's being arrested for sharing official documents. Not the disgusting crimes he committed against children and/or women. It's not real accountability, it's theater meant to placate the angry masses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago* (4 children)

    I read some analysis on this in the guardian, it predicted this would happen, because the police have limited resources and can only follow up one of the two charges. This charge is chosen because there is far more likely to be incontrovertible evidence, probably in the form of paper trails etc. Whereas proving he raped children decades ago relies on witness testimony, which is far easier for his very expensive (taxpayer-funded, mind) lawyers to talk down in court.
    If this cunt sees a single day in prison I call that a win.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    Meanwhile in america: {crickets, followed by a tumbleweed blowing across a sand covered road}

    And that's after the obese orange child rapist was best friends with Epstein for decades, and has been mentioned many thousands of times, with thousands of pictures, and numerous sexual accusations all in the Epstein files.
    The fat cunt could shoot a baby live on TV and no fucker would do a thing about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    He's only 66?! Damn, he looks 80.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 22 points 7 months ago

    I wonder if this walking pile of stale bread is sweating now.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago

    HOLY CRAP IT'S REAL.

    I didn't believe it when I first saw it. FUCKING AWESOME.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The nonce formerly known as prince facing justice? Wow. I'm looking out of the window right now waiting for the pigs to fly by.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Hang the childfuckers high! As per law with due process obviously, and yes I know they don't have the death penalty which I do not support generally because we can't trust authorities to get the right people let alone to decide who should be executed.

    Still though, send this guy to like a penal colony on some island north of scotland or something, building sea bird habitat on bread and water rations.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 13 points 7 months ago* (6 children)

    I wsn't expecting to develop begrudging respect for England today.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [+] 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Good! I hope this just isn’t for appearances.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago*

    Some of those who have billions

    Are the same who rape children

    RATM

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

    Republicanists (no relation to the rotten GOP) are going to have a field day today.

    It's on the Beeb. Full throttle. https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=M5I5ATQy6zk

    Also, he's gonna be a fucking meme.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›