1430
Just saying (thelemmy.club)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

What's more important? Cheap power for the whole country? Or the pockets of the people in charge?

just in case/s

[-] ms_lane@lemmy.world 2 points 36 minutes ago

Energy would be so abundant it'd be free, if we'd done Fusion 50 years ago.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 20 hours ago

Well maybe, but only if they owned the infrastructure themselves.

As it stands, the price paid to renewable energy suppliers tracks the amount paid to fossil fuel suppliers.

There's a reason every farmer wants to fill their fields with solar panels, and it's got little to do with making electricity cheaper for the end user.

That said, there's no reason not to do it anyway, at least if we want more than a few more hundred years of humanity. A tough ask in a time where every decision is made based on an election that happens in the next 4 years by people who won't live another 20.

[-] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 2 points 18 hours ago

And housing would be cheaper if it wasn't treated as a value-retaining investment.

[-] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Clearly this sub haven't seen this video from Technology Connections. It breaks it all down for you step by step why the statement is true.

[-] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

Its still crazy how great solar can be when doing the maths based off his states solar farms. Imagine how great the numbers would be if the sunny parts of the world did solar too

load more comments (20 replies)

Just say it's better for AI and they're all for it

[-] YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Where I live in Scotland about 73% of electricity generated come from renewables (mostly wind and hydro). I'm hugely in favour of this, but the bills keep rising.

I firmly believe the utility companies should be nationalised. I'm not against capitalism per se, but the current setup is a racket.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Water is essential to living.
Electricity is mostly essential.
Why these two utilities are privately owned is beyond me.

[-] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

To pay dividends to shareholders whilst you let the utility degrade to the point where the government steps in to bail you out anyway. Perfect investment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

You know why right?

The grid is constraint and because of this it makes prices really high where the congestion is. Now the logical thing is to allow a different price where there is free energy like in Scotland verse where it is constraint.

But! The issue is where it is constraint and that's south east England. And as everyone in the country knows no one gets anything in the UK unless south east England has more of it for less.

So higher prices in SE England is not going to happen. If it was the other way around I'm certain the government would say fuck the Scots they should have more wind power if they wanted cheap electricity.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MashedHobbits@lemy.lol 15 points 1 day ago

Government should be for the people not for the corporations

[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

In many cities in America, private companies threaten cities demanding that they get paid to expand, or else they'll leave.

Comcast demanded they get city investments to expand wifi to more of the city and even promised free wifi to public places. And after millions of city dollars given, they said, "nevermind".

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Energy is cheaper where the government has a public alternative. That goes for all utilities and services.

[-] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Finland has done something like this and the few days of winter where it's very cold and no wind are kinda rough. There was a day recently where I spent 50 euros on electricity alone. And I have somewhat efficient heating tech like a geothermal heat pump.

[-] treesquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anything cheaper for the consumer means less profit, which means less money for bribes, which means conservative governments are against it

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Technology Connections has a video on it...
But i doubt bills would go down; it's just that line would go up.

[-] skip0110@lemmy.zip 142 points 2 days ago

Why are utilities privatized?

Our energy provider increased our rates, then reported record breaking profits the next year. :(

(US)

[-] Wander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Grid should be public and production should be privatised.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Shit sun power won't make my yacht go burr.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] XaetaCore@lemmy.neondystopia.world -1 points 21 hours ago

Nuclear Energy because green energy is really expensive too

[-] liuther9@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago
[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 39 points 2 days ago

Nah. They would be 50-60% cheaper if;

  1. They required the choice between two different administrators.
  2. They were ran as non profit (private equity is ruining utilities currently).
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
1430 points (98.3% liked)

memes

20171 readers
1412 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS