you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Government should be for the people not for the corporations

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    In many cities in America, private companies threaten cities demanding that they get paid to expand, or else they'll leave.

    Comcast demanded they get city investments to expand wifi to more of the city and even promised free wifi to public places. And after millions of city dollars given, they said, "nevermind".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    But your not thinking of the poor poor oil execs whom won't get their return on their bribe invenstment made to their super PAC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Super PACs are so 2012. In 2024 SCOTUS ruled that officials are allowed to accept "gratuities" so long as they don't directly say it's a bribe.

    Unless it's for the President. Then they can just say it's a bribe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago*

    How do you want them to be for the people and not for corporations if you want them to subsidize an industry? At the end of the day that will be paid to corporations, and you are giving corporations more incentive to get into your congressperson's office to help them figure out how to divide it up. Why would you want more cash exchanged between them and more face time between them? Bad idea if you want corporations out of politics.

    More money for [industry x] literally means the government working for some corporations. Doesn't matter what industry x is.

  • source
  • parent