739
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Xenny@lemmy.world 2 points 15 minutes ago

"Chrome?" People still using this shit?

[-] bampop@lemmy.world 3 points 41 minutes ago

So weird that companies waste so much time trying to find ways to stop me from stopping them from wasting my time.

Maybe they should do a study in exactly where the ad revenue comes from. I strongly suspect that people who use ad blockers, and people who potentially generate revenue from ads, are two non-intersecting sets.

[-] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 29 points 7 hours ago

Ads need to be banned. They are inherently harmful, inherently deceptive, and only valuable in competition with other advertising. There is a direct line between the advertising model and the malignant politics that are destroying our world. Ban them all.

[-] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I was born in the early 90s, got non-dial up home internet access in 2003, and never ever, in the history of my time being on the internet. I have never ever, never not even once clicked on an ad on purpose. Like the Yahtzee ad thats showing right above your comment, I will never click this shit and follow it all the way up to giving my credit card info over. Why do we even have these nowadays, aside from tracking you?

[-] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 6 points 5 hours ago

There are ads on Lemmy? I've never seen one.

But, like so many things in this world, if you ask 'why is this a thing?' the answer is almost always 'idiots exist.' A handful of idiots DO click on ads and buy the products, download the malware, etc. It's not much but the 30 real people lend legitimacy to the 970 'totally real people' who 'totally clicked on the ad but just didn't buy anything' according to the metrics, and it's seemingly impossible to sell anything without paying rent to the marketers because it's essentially analogous to nuclear arms; if no one had it, everyone would be happier, healthier, and safer, but if they have it and you don't, you lose.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 4 points 1 hour ago

There are ads on Lemmy? I’ve never seen one.

That's on their specific client.

[-] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Because some people do click it. Children, old people, tech illiterate people. The exact target market for those wanting to exploit people.

[-] Fridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 hours ago

It doesn't help their case that most mobile websites are just completely unusable with ads enabled. It's impressive how shit they are sometimes

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 13 points 8 hours ago

The trick is to not use chromium

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 24 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Is it?

I used vanilla Chrome with “Ublock lite” in someone else’s computer for a bit, and was shocked by how many ads got through, not to speak of annoyances and what I suspect was a malware link. We also got a related ad on TV soon after browsing for something.

I think Google’s having their cake and eating it. It blocks enough for users to feel like they’re getting Adblock, yet it’s not much skin off Google's back.

[-] TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I have:

-Brave as my browser

-Ublock Origin

-DNS-wide AdBlock

-Youtube sponser block

I barely see any ads now, except those that pop up as an overlay and nag you, and some of them can be block manaully.

[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

blocking for 35 years. ditched chrome for firefox last year. about to move on. maybe lynks. like the umatrix addon plus a few others

[-] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

It's a good thing Vivaldi's ad-and-tracker-blocker is still there (although you can install Chrome extensions in Vivaldi though)

[-] Zink@programming.dev 58 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I wonder, is hatred of advertising a common thing for folks with ADHD? They take away something you are giving your attention to because it interests you, and shove some other crap in your face just to serve their own interests.

I remember being enraged at the scheduled commercial breaks in the '80s and '90s. The only benefit they had was that I always knew which segment of the show I was in and therefore roughly what time it was.

But now? It is so much damn worse and the normies just seem more OK with it than ever. I just remind myself they are living in a society that conditions them to accept it and gives them a thousand more serious things to worry about.

Edit: some words not have right letters

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 8 hours ago

I genuinely believe most forms of advertising on the web are ableist because they try to make them as distracting as possible. Removing those ads is accessibility.

I don't consider ads at the start and end of videos to be ableist, but they're still annoying. Mid video ads, pause screen ads, and banner ads are all ableist.

[-] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I'm ADHD and I fucking hate ads. They screw up my attention and are just scummy. It doesn't help that I'm constantly cognizant of the evils that are corporations.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

I've been wondering if ads never got more intrusive than the simple banners on the side or top of sites if there would've been a huge push to block them. I think most people would figure that, especially on small sites run by people instead of huge corporations, that web hosting isn't free so a banner on a page was a fair tradeoff.

But of course that couldn't be enough for the ad folk who started ramping things up with their flashing ads and pop-ups, eventually culminating in the autoplay video malware hellscape the net has turned into today.

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I can only speak for myself, but when I first looked into ad blocking I was only looking into it because of animated ads/ads with audio. Static ads were easy enough to ignore 95% of the time, which of course is why they escalated them to be more obnoxious. So now they're all blocked of course, they overreached and it cost them any ad views from me. I imagine I'm probably not alone in that.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago

I have wasted so much of my life watching adverts. I am absolutely over it and I get agitated if I watch them now. I cancel any streaming service that tries to force them on me and I am relying more and more on Plex/Jellyfin. I am not going to waste any more of my life watching marketing lies.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

On the contrary, my eyes slide right off ads. They even did when I was a little kid.

Why should I care about something I’m not looking for? It’s just going to make whatever they’re advertising more expensive to buy.

Maybe that’s the autism side of AuADHD taking over, though.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago

I hate it because it’s an unethical practice to manipulate or mislead and all modern advertising uses dark patterns to try to get you to overconsume.

The ADHD distress is just another side effect of all that

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Combo of ADHD and living through the 2000s with Internet Explorer where ads often installed malware and viruses. If you DIDN'T use an Ad Blocker you were playing a game of Russian Roulette every time you opened a web page.

Popups, pop unders, blaring audio, malware, slow page loads...ads are a scourge.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 24 points 14 hours ago

Over my cold, dead hands. Fuck you and your shitty worldview,

[-] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 278 points 21 hours ago

Let's be honest: The internet without adblock is unusable. I really do not know how all those people without adblock are doing that.

It... Really, really is. I remember using Fandom on mobile being so bad I set up an auto redirect to breezewiki, and that was with adblockers. Now that I have DNS-wide adblocking on, when I accidentally click a Fandom link it's pleasantly surprising how well that's working.

load more comments (44 replies)
[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 57 points 18 hours ago

The ad company hates ad blockers. Whoda thunk it? Also, don't let web browser engines become a monoculture. We went through this shit with Internet Explorer. We know where this leads.

[-] kerthale@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

Let’s be very clear here. Chrome ripped off the hard work from the KDE webkit people. That is also the reason much of it is open source, because open source and volunteer contributions made it live.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago

Who the fuck is still using Chrome?!

[-] arararagi@ani.social 7 points 8 hours ago

Everyone, they really don't care about ads as much as us.

[-] ilillilillilillililli@lemmy.world 38 points 16 hours ago

Oh, you know. Just 3.6 billion fucking people (73% of web users). But definitely not you and me. I've been on Firefox since 1.0 (2004) and switched to Librewolf a few years ago when Mozilla lost it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 23 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Most of the time I dont see any ads on YT and I watch a lot of content there. It's getting harder to not get ads there on all my devices but it's doable.

But when I go see my parents, I use their smartTV to watch YT. And I realize how horrible the experience is with all the interruptions and the impossibility to just focus on what you are watching.

And yesterday I got multiple time ads for a crypto scam called Ryxero or something. The scam was using AI clones of Bernard Arnault, a french billionaire, pretending you could win 1000€ a day...

The scam also had deepfakes of news outlets pretending that people in France were "queuing to ATM" to get their money...

I think it's absolutely unacceptable that YT let them serve crypto scams to millions in complete impunity.

I will try to report the scam to authorities. I also reported it to YT but I dont expect them to act. The 3mn long ad was paid by an american business called "EX" which I think serves their scam abroad through YT in complete impunity.

For me the scam and AI clones is obvious but how many got scammed with the complicity of YouTube ? Hundreds ?

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

BTW you can/should install an alternative YT frontend on smart TVs, if you want to watch YT and are forced to use a smart TV. Even something semi-suitable like Pipepipe will do, but there are also frontends more suited for TV use, e.g. SmartTube

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
739 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

80724 readers
3948 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS