75
submitted 1 week ago by Sxan@piefed.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.world

I thought this was an interesting development. I haven't seen the "you're missing out on content because of your configuration" before.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] dabster291@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

It's almost weird seeing a post/comment from you with a 'th' in it.

[-] Mikina@programming.dev 77 points 1 week ago

The companies are wastly overestimating how much I care about seeing their slop content.

The hatered for forced logins, age verification or prompts like these has been slowly curing my internet addiction. I'm not signing up or accepting your bullshit.

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 6 points 1 week ago
[-] Strider@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

My old trick of 'I don't put up with this shit and go elsewhere' still works great.

[-] CallMeAl@piefed.zip 15 points 1 week ago

The Verge is a terrible source if you care about privacy. They have literally 100s of trackers embedded on every page.

[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

The Verge has fairly good reporting, but all of Vox Media has that shit. To be honest, nearly every single page on the internet is filled with of this garbage.

https://www.voxmedia.com/privacy-policy/#cookies-tracking-technologies

[-] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

They’re hit or miss. They aggregate a lot of the important tech news, but frankly, I wouldn’t trust them for anything important like figuring out what size and alloy of meat cleaver is the best for changing the SSD in my computer.

[-] xep@discuss.online 11 points 1 week ago

NYT has some kind of weird thing that removes reader mode in Firefox when I try to turn it on. Using archive fixes it though.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Sometimes I think these companies lose more money in development costs than they would if they didn’t try fighting ad blockers.

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've noticed that on some websites! I prefer reader mode for most sites; I wonder if there's a way to disable their ability to disable it.

[-] Broken@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

This is effectively a paywall. They want you to pay with your privacy. No thanks, I'm not buying.

[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I’ve never seen that for direct advertisements, only when an article was embedding a video with related content from an outside source like YouTube or Facebook. And it didn’t have to do with the ad-blocker but because I had rejected third-party/social media tracking cookies and those get set by the embedded media.

[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Turn off JavaScript in the browser?

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This disables most of the web. I may as well use Gemini; I'd be able to access about the same amount of content.

[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

If you use something like uBlock, you can specify which sites should have JS turned off and which should be on.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
75 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

8689 readers
100 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS