I thought you were armed.
Isn’t it better to lose your jobs, healthcare and homes in a complete shutdown than your lives trying to take on the government?
There’s steps of difficulty to this. This has been explained to Americans for decades now but they don’t listen very well and learn even less.
The easiest is to vote. The more commitment you give this, the better the result, quality of candidate and the easier it is to get the change you want. It still works well when the participation rate is over 80%, that usually eliminates electoral college and tampering issues.
When you have failed to take the easy way, the next easiest is to shut the means of production, everything, down. This is where it’s better to lose the healthcare, housing and jobs again because the hardest way, civil war, will absolutely take your life and you don’t get that one back.
Given it’s already at ‘execute citizens in the street’, worrying about jobs et al is probably a bit whiny.
Another thing, a reminder again, the longer it’s left the worse it gets and the harder it is to fix. The rest of the world won’t pick and choose between individuals either; they’ll all be held equally responsible for any damage their laziness in not voting causes.
I wouldn’t recommend trying on the violent one though. Sure, arm to defend as is your right but it’s easier to starve and be homeless for a while than it is to give your life.