top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 113 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Let me guess what kind of people predominantly lived in the neighborhoods that were bulldozed.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So you have a before version?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sure the designers of this monstrosity thought, "There are only black people living there, so it's a win-win" -.-

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • The expressway must expand in order to acommodate the increasing needs of the expressway

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Am I the only one who finds the 1950s version also not nice from an urban planning perspective? I mean, it is a car-centered design anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    No, the 1950s version (actually more like 1900s; those houses were already decades old at the time they were photographed) was good. It was a traditional street grid with small blocks, and there were streetcars going all over the place. Sure it was mostly single-family (probably with more than a few duplexes sprinkled in), but it had great bones for densifying later when demand justified it.

    I live only a few miles from the area pictured, in a neighborhood with the same development pattern. Even though it's been damaged by the removal of the old streetcars and having zoning superimposed upon it after the fact (which causes problems by mandating things like too-large setbacks and minimum parking requirements, as well as outlawing corner stores within residential areas), it's still mostly fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    JUST ONE MORE LAME,I SWEAR TO GOD, JUST ONE MORE LANE AND WE'RE DONE. ONE MOAR LANE. MOAAAAR

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    “Trains Are Too Expensive And Would Take Years To Build“ - guy who remembers the interstate being built.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    Looks like what happens with headphone cables in the pocket.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I've been playing cities skyline and I'll be honest, when my city gets like that I just restart.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And in Cities Skyline you can just pause time, delete and fix a bunch of shit, and continue. Instant and nobody complains that you just bulldozed their house.

    I think highways would look nicer if real city planners had the ability to redesign everything vs add on pieces over time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I like to think that people who get relocated in my skylines games get compensated appropriately and receive decent support in their relocation.

    Because video games are supposed to be a form of escapism and it doesn't get more escapism than that :/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    When you bulldoze houses in skylines and unpause you'll notice your population goes down. Because they were inside the houses. That you bulldozed. Have a good day!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Nice little neighborhood you got there. Would be a shame if someone needed a new highway, wouldn’t it?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    You can take this picture in just about any city in the US too. NYT did a pretty good piece about it, gifted so y'all can read it: Can Removing Highways Fix America’s Cities? https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/05/27/climate/us-cities-highway-removal.html?unlocked_article_code=1.60w.uuX5.Oo4CsHZXGv8Q&smid=nytcore-android-share

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Cities should be built around people, not motor vehicles.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    How do roads even end up like this? The cloverleaf is as extreme as I'm willing to drive through. If anything like this came up in Google maps for my drive I would just nope on home.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Engineer answer: being a stack interchange, it's actually easier to navigate than a cloverleaf because there's only one exit in each direction instead of separate "A" and "B" exits with an entrance ramp and weaving in between. The complexity in this case simply comes from the fact that it's superimposed on top of what used to be a street grid, so they added a bunch of exits to local streets.

    Big-picture answer: the desire to put freeways there in the first place is the product of mental illness.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    It’s a good thing removing all those homes definitely didn’t cause or contribute to any way more serious problems in society. Right?

    /s

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Oh but at least we know those highways were built there, on top of all those homes, because that was the most efficient place for it and not because the people who lived in those houses were less desirable than those the car making corporation owning fucks liked

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    “What do you mean, why's it got to be built?” he said. “It's a bypass. You've got to build bypasses.” Bypasses are devices that allow some people to dash from point A to point B very fast while other people dash from point B to point A very fast.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    FYI, unless I'm mistaken, that is spaghetti junction and it's not actually in Atlanta, but just northeast of it in Doraville

    Edit: I was severely mistaken...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sadly, that’s the intersection of I-75/85 and I-20, right in the middle of downtown ATL. Here’s a more recent picture showing some more context.

    Also, here’s an article talking about the history of I-20 being built through Atlanta: https://smartgrowthamerica.org/program/divided-by-design/atlanta-ga/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    As another said, that's not spaghetti junction (Tom Moreland interchange), but frankly people get pretty fast and loose with how much of the surrounding area they'll call 'Atlanta' anyway. The actual city of Atlanta proper is much smaller than most people would think by just looking at a satellite photo, and the distinction between the many cities usually doesn't matter much unless you live there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Zoom out slightly.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›