54
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 21 points 1 month ago

They wake up every day and try to decide how to lose users. From killing things to enshittifying them.

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 18 points 1 month ago

To be fair, they're only talking about being able to fetch other (third party) mail accounts via Gmail. No one in their right mind should be doing this anyway. And only via POP3, IMAP is still supported.

[-] eleijeep@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago

No one in their right mind should be doing this anyway

Why not?

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 3 points 1 month ago

Google are an advertisement company. Their business model is data mining. It should be an inconvenience for them to build a profile on you. Running your third party email via them is the opposite of that.

[-] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 1 points 1 month ago

Not sure what op meant, but according to TFA, "POP3 requires sending passwords in plaintext."

[-] eleijeep@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes just like HTTP, FTP, SMTP, telnet and all the other pre-TLS protocols that we now run over TLS for exactly this reason.

Google, just like every other modern mail client, supports connecting to POP3 servers over SSL:

WDLrB05Knrl5Z0M.png

[-] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 2 points 1 month ago

You are right. I seem to recall viewing these settings about 100 years ago.

It sounds remarkably janky, and a bit of an unusual edge case. Why would someone need this specific pattern?

Eventually this is the sort of thing that isn't worth supporting.

[-] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago

I used to do it back when gmail first started, I connected it to my previous email account so anything addressed to my old account would get transferred to my new one.

I could probably count the number of emails it ever retrieved on one hand.

That is still an edge case, and doesn't really address why Pop would be required.

[-] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

That's the point of the feature though. POP3 moves emails, it's really a transfer protocol rather than an access protocol.

I assume Google is killing it since they assume they're effectively in-charge of email outside of things like company Outlook accounts. They've got no need to worry about people migrating to gmail, since everybody starts out on it now.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago

I think they calculate what they can change that loses less users than it gains in advertising revenue. Just slowly turning the screws more and more.

[-] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It’s probably someone going for promo by removing this feature. Doubt it affects the bottom line much, just reduces complexity.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

IIRC, POP3 downloaded all emails to local device. If you have more than one device, the first one gets it all and the second or more see nothing.

IMAP kept the messages on the server so there was one source of truth and multiple devices could access the same emails.

Most email clients support both. There are probably some people still running old POP3 clients, or they set it up one way and never bothered to change.

Not sure why gmail would care. Code's been working for decades. Unless there are security considerations not worth mitigating.

[-] flowers_galore2@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago

Good, nothing of value is lost.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)

Tech

3135 readers
2 users here now

A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes

Things that fit:

Things that don't fit

Community Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS