The scheme, where staff have their working hours cut by 20% while keeping their existing salary, has been adopted by some businesses which argue it improves work-life balance without damaging productivity.
Yes.
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
101 points (97.2% liked)
Europe
8484 readers
1 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐ฉ๐ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Reality and facts don't matter to conservatives, only how they feel about something. They feel people should be worked harder. So these trials are getting shelved.
This isn't about value for the taxpayer. It's about power. It's about keeping those peons in line.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/NmbflJhPvWg?si=ndNPcf2EDGFGgMkU
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
At one point in my career I had a 4-day week and let me tell you that it was glorious. Instead of barely having time on the weekend to recover from the eat-work-sleep daily grind, I actually had some time to feel human again and even spend some money on a hobby. A hobby!
At one point I had every other Friday off and even having the three day weekend only every other week was really refreshing and such a nice break. I miss it, I've been hoping it becomes more common.
I'll never go back to anything more than a three day week. And if I had to feed on gruel only, I'd never accept this kind work ethic being forced on me again.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
LONDON, Oct 26 (Reuters) - Britain on Thursday told local government councils in England to end any trials of a four-day working week for their employees, saying the idea does not offer taxpayers good value for money.
The scheme, where staff have their working hours cut by 20% while keeping their existing salary, has been adopted by some businesses which argue it improves work-life balance without damaging productivity.
"The government is being crystal clear that it does not support the adoption of the four-day working week within the local government sector," Britain's minister for local government Lee Rowley said in a statement.
"Local authorities that are considering adopting it should not do so.
Those who have adopted it already should end those practice immediately."
The government said it supported the right of individual employees to request flexible working, such as changes to their hours or location of work, but "removing 20% of a local authority's potential capacity does not offer value for money for residents".
The original article contains 165 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Fucking morons in ivory towers. Complaining about removing 20% of capacity while simultaneously ignoring the fact that productivity is at running at 60% for the 5 day week. Remove a day and work at 80% and thereโs still room for improvement in capacity but these leeches have never worked a real day in their lives to understand that
At no point of the indicator that they understand the core point.
The entire point is it doesn't affect productivity. These guys really are melons.
I used to work in government and the amount of sitting around we did was ridiculous. It was definitely more than 20% I'll tell you that. We used to spend ages waiting for department A to do their job, so department B could do their jobs, so we could do our job. The actual task would only take maybe 5% of the time already allocated but we had to wait.
This guys knows whats up.
I love this bot, it's always so honest. Like it would be really easy for the dev to put in a threshold for posting, like "if compression < 20%, skip post". But nope, here it is basking naked, in all its glory, good or bad.
I once saw it post a negative savings -- was due to an html entity hiding throughout the article that got counted as one char in the original, but as multiple in the summary.
To be fair, I care less about the reduction in length and more about not having to click on an ad infested site.
Yep, that and pay walls
People might be happier without drawbacks. Stop it!
I really hope they'll never ever reduce public offices opening times in my country (which are still reduced are the pandemic). The bureaucracy is already not working due high levels of inefficiency, corruption and absenteeism. It'll be a nightmare. I'm from ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ค needless to say
4 day work week does not mean reducing office opening times.
In a serious country that's true, but we are "creative". Online platforms are unavailable and offices still with reduced schedules due to "contagion". Trying to obtain a passport or even an ID is a nightmare.
funny, sound exactly like germany ๐ฌ
Oh no... Italy has always looked towards "teutonic efficiency" as a model, what now?
and here I was hoping it would say to stop trialing and start implementing. Sad.
I see Tufton St. has put its foot down