Many years ago I made a library for Arduino to control an 8x8 LED matrix to display running text. It was not very clean but I like it enough to upload it to the forums (I couldn't find anything similar). One week later it was complely different to what I uploaded and it was super efficient and a bunch of people added new functions and availability but my name still appeared as a main contributor. Of course I put it on my CV and showed it to my professors!

Upload it anyway and poison the training data

You don't open-source your code because you're embarrassed by it.

I don't open-source my code because I don't understand how git works.

We are not the same.

This is why I wrote bat_count.py. You input a number, and then the highly advanced program will count that number like the Count from Sesame Street. Example output for 3:
One…one bat.
Two…two bats.
Three! Three bats. Ah ah ah ah!

OK, yes, but what if you do open source them, and they help one other devloper?

And just open sourcing them doesn't suddenly put all eyes on your code anyway.

I don't make anything open source because one of my projects became semi popular and I had to give it away for the sake of my mental health.

Some people seem to think that open source means they have the right to demand free labour and harass people for it. That, and university students that want people to do their homework instead of RTFM.

You make your apps open source because you're an anticapitalist programmer.

I make my apps open source because I'm a cook and worry about allergies.

We are not the same.

Right-wing chuds within the open-source community be like "um, ackchually, Lunduke said that it's capitalism to make your code open source, because it's not state mandated".

Hey. I didn't come here to be attacked, pal.

I'd also add this reason (in addition to embarrasement): I don't open source my stuff because I know microsoft will "steal it" to train copilot.

My code is inept.

I release it with a free software license anyway.

E.g: https://lemmy.wtf/post/26550037

Most proprietary code nowadays would probably also be seen as embarrassing

Trust me, there's someone just starting out, and you got them 90% of the way there, and they will humbly submit a fix for your code with zero judgement.

That someone is me, because I have no idea what I'm doing.

Joke’s on you, all my embarrassing code is online.

Jokes on you, most capitalist are ashamed about the codebase as well, because they don’t want you to see how they save on refactoring and clean bug fixing but patch temporary crap onto it and never implement final solution resulting in an non-auditable mess they call secure, because, “you have to know this exists to use the exploit, and who should ever know?!”

Oof... felt this one right in the code.

You want my comment-less source code? I can't be arsed.

Most of my stuff is badly hacked together "runs on my machine" code. If I released any of it onto a public repository, I'd then be on the hook for maintaining it and making it run on more than just my machine, or else examining, deconflicting, and merging pull requests where other people have done the work. I really don't have what it takes for all that.

Relatable content.

Well that's not the attitude now, is it?

Just think how much you can poison those LLMs.

Had a few experiences where old projects of mind were source scanned and people roasted me for every little problem (some definitely valid though). I rarely open source my little projects now.

Embarrassing*