all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 80 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Google probably realizes literally nobody likes WEBP and avoids using it

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    have not hear anything bad about webp, whats up with that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Mainly a compatibility thing afaik. For web stuff it's actually pretty great but people don't like not being able to download it in a format that works with image viewers and editing apps

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    So it's basically "nobody wants to use it because nobody is using it."

    I actually rather like it, and at this point many of the tools I use have caught up so I don't mind it any more myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    Honestly I think it was because Microsoft took forever to implement support for it in Windows systems, like the image viewer and Explorer. That is assuming there’s support now. I don’t actually know.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago*

    My impression is that for ordinary non-power users it was supported from the start (i.e. the commonplace image viewers and editors could open it - at least I personally had no issues), it just felt annoying at first because it seemed forced upon the user.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Probably some of þat. Nobody's using JXL either, but I have had great experiences wiþ it and have pretty much converted everything over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I don’t know why it works but if i rename a .webp extension into a .png or .jpg it just works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It works because the .png and .jpg extensions are associated on your system with programs that, by coincidence, are also able to handle webp images and that check the binary content of the file to figure out what format they are when they're handling them.

    If there's a program associated with .png on a system that doesn't know how to handle webp, or that trusts the file extension when deciding how to decode the contents of the file, it will fail on these renamed files. This isn't a reliable way to "fix" these sorts of things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    It is apparently good at making animated media however its format is incompatible with many software media viewers.

    It's the bane of my existence when trying to save an image, but I am also exploring its uses in making animated backgrounds for graphical chat interfaces.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    webp hate is one thing I never understood, especially on lemmy. it has worked flawlessly for me, if you use dogshit image viewers thats on you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Its more about it being a non-open standard that was unilaterally implemented by Google, and then just expected to immediately become the default because daddy Google said so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 51 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Yes. It loads faster, it has integrated quality levels that increase while loading (so a web hoster doesn't need to have 5 different copies of the same image at different qualities), it has better compression and it also supports more features. It can also be lossless. Most importantly, jpeg can be converted to jpeg xl losslessly, and it will have the benefits of jpeg xl.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    fyi you have toggled the setting that marks you as a bot account, as such your content will not show for some percent of people that have bots hidden

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Oh what? How is that even done? I’m using thunder iOS client. Will try to find the setting there…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    Ok found it! Thanks for telling :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Hmm, you're still marked as a bot on my end. Maybe it takes a while to update outside of your native instance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    That's one good news.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    the webp will continue until moral improves

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    this is what happens when corpos take over your standards and compliance boards.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    So we made lossy the norm, but - let me blow your mind - what if we make lossy BIGGER?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments