top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 223 points 9 months ago (6 children)

How many other animals did they put through a sieve to reach this conclusion? How many?!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 78 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago*

    Many, many poor little creatures with simpler or more robust or segmented nervous systems. Mostly common worms, cnidarians, starfish, metamorphosing insects, and more in that line of thought. It’s common in college bio to watch planarians unmangle themselves. Sucks for them, but they get food and relative safety, so I’ve always considered it an even trade

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 145 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    If you mix up the grindings of multiple sponges, do they only recombine with their own cells?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Excellent question!

    Now on to the grinder...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    There seem to be many of these multicellular animals who don't feel like a singular individual animal. I was commenting on a post a few months ago about the most genetically simple multicellular animal, this thing has less base pairs than most bacteria, and it can also do this trick where disassociated cells recombine into new individuals. This creature also reproduce sexually if and only if the concentration of fellow individuals is high enough, cells will just leave the body and join a new one like for fun. It really calls into question what an individual is.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 45 points 9 months ago

    I guess it makes sense that multicellularity would be more of a spectrum than a binary condition. If life evolved into it gradually, then it would make sense to find a lot of "intermediate" evolutionary states that don't feel like they're distinctly one or the other.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 66 points 9 months ago (12 children)

    How many animals have we ground up and put through a sieve into salt water to be this confident about it being the only animal that can do this? I need sources.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    I mean, enough that manufacturing of homogenizers is a thing. https://improbable.com/2021/05/13/shakespeare-and-the-whole-mouse-homogenizer/?amp=1

    The ad features the comforting headline: “Only the Polytron reduces an entire mouse to a soup-like homogenate in 30 seconds”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I think there's nematodes that we've blended up before, but instead you get a bunch of nematodes instead of just one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago*

    “Hey, Bob, watcha getting up to?”

    “I’m just chopping up these worms.”

    “… Why?”

    “… sssssscience?”

    “Holy shit, they’re all functioning individually!”

    “Oh, thank fu- I mean, yeah, that’s what I was testing for. …Do we have any dogs?”

    “…”

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 36 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    My body still repairs itself while I dissociate. Does that count?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Don't caterpillars turn thier cells to mush when they turn into butterflys?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah, but I don't think it works with a grinder.

    However, apparently caterpillars retain memories from their caterpillar form when in butterfly form! That's pretty cool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago

    Ah, yes, I too read The Bikini Bottom Horror

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago

    Fact: Spongebob can teleport

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    Would have been better without the dumb AI image

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    What if you cut it in half first, would the ground up halves restore to half a sponge?

    Then what if you stir the sponge powder and remove half.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    So, my assumption is: separated cells with the same genetic code, or some other biomarker of "individuality" that might not technically be unique, will attach to each other given the chance.

    Super quick research suggests they don't have organs or a nervous system, but do have specialized bits like flagella to move water through their pores/tunnels. The majority of the cells just ... are. Sounds more like a colony of genetically identical cells than a single multi-cellular creature (to me), but I assume biologists have much more information and reason to consider them the way they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    How do they know other lifeforms do not do that?

    Answer me! How do they know?!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Do they regrow their body or a new body made from the same parts?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    Like Deadpool

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    So, when they reassemble does it start with the middle finger?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    TIL Deadpool is a sponge.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    So that's how Boros did it

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Forbidden cake.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›