Same thing has been happening in Australia.

Murdoch's organisations (nearly all the newspapers & TV) take every opportunity to criticise and attack the ABC (Australia's public broadcaster, equivalent to the BBC). The constant claim is that they are biased and left wing, even though a number of studies have shown that their reporting is neutral.

The last couple of Chairman of the ABC have been ex-Murdoch employees. So they are now being attacked from inside as well. Cuts have been made to news, current affairs and investigative journalism shows.

I wouldn't be surprised if they sold off Bluey.

But how can the BBC deny the genocide they facilitated any harder

As stated on Reuters about that:

"The most serious was the revelation that a Panorama documentary aired just before the November 2024 U.S. presidential election had spliced together two parts of a Trump speech so he appeared to be encouraging the Capitol Hill riot of January 6, 2021. The documentary was made by an independent production company."

So there's a few things at play here from what I can tell.

1. The splice is real (?) And was produced by a third party and not the BBC itself.
2. A splice is not exactly the fine British way of doing things. (Okay, I give them that, a splice shouldn't be needed to get a point across)
3. The thing the documentary was getting at, in other words that the orange did in fact encourage violence should the election go how it went in 2020, still holds true. Spliced video or not.

Is it a journalistic foul? Yes.

Do the facts presented hold up even if shown in a less honest way? Yes.

So the outrage is about less honest use of media, you know... The thing the far right is doing all the time. Rules for thee but not me and all that. Just another day in the playbook for the far right.