top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 95 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I hope they also enhance their social media strategy, as their unprofessional and aggressive way of communication makes me question their trustworthiness more than I want, as I think the project is awesome.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I'm out of the loop. Any examples of this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 10 months ago* (7 children)

    They shit on other projects all the time (frequently unprovoked, sometimes without the original conversation having anything to do about security). They also often reply with multiple posts with multiple paragraphs each when shitting on other projects. It shouldn't take very long to find an example if you trawl through their replies on Twitter, Bluesky, or Mastodon.

    They have good points, but they're often either not relevant to the conversation or worded in such a way that it sounds like every project other than GrapheneOS is dogshit.

    They also sometimes go on (IMO) paranoid rants about XYZ project systematically trying to destroy them or whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I got the same vibes when they describe in detail how supposedly terrible Firefox on Android is for security. I actually didn't believe them just based on the tone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I mean, I think they're right that the security is worse. I'm pretty sure it's worse on desktop too, just not nearly as bad. Last I checked, Firefox on Android still doesn't do per-site process isolation by default, for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago

    Yep. They need an actual comms professional. I love GOS and am forever grateful to the team but having a bunch of non-nuero-typical devs speaking for them is not doing them any favours.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Doesn't seem "it's finally ready" when they didn't name the name.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Amateur marketing speak for "we're considering bringing it to other hardware"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 46 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Break free, implying they won't support Pixels anymore (is how I interpreted it at first anyway), but they are simply expanding support for more devices. 👍

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    It'd be funny to me if Pixel sales tanked a significant amount and it turns out that people only used their phones for Graphene.

    Me personally, I don't like Pixel phones. But I've owned every single one of them through 9 Pro.

    I look forward to a Graphene future.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 10 months ago

    I'm glad this is getting some traction now, but this is some poor reporting. This is one site reporting what another site saw, which was just GrapheneOS restating things they've been saying since the summer, with no new info. I read both this article and the one they link to as their source and learned nothing I haven't already known for months just from casually checking on GrapheneOS socials.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I'll speculate.

    My money's on Asus. Asus is a bit more mainstream than Nothing but still enough of an underdog that I think they should see the value in a partnership. They already target an enthusiast niche with the ROG line.

    The Nothing Phone 3 uses an SD 8s Gen 4, which is not Qualcomm's "flagship" SOC, and it would be stretching the definition of "major" OEM, but who knows? This seems the most likely after Asus.

    Moto's only flagship Snapdragon phone is the Razr Ultra, which I guess is possible. It'd be weird, but hey, I'd buy one.

    OnePlus has been moving in the opposite direction for years now, locking things down more and more. I think they're too big for their britches at this point.

    Sony's flagships are crazy expensive, well beyond the price of Pixels. They also don't cover the US market, though I'm not sure how important that is to the Graphene devs.

    HMD doesn't make any phones with flagship SOCs. I think their best is the Skyline, with a 7s gen 2, Qualcomm's fourth-tier SOC line (the "s" stands for shitty).

    Fairphone doesn't use flagship Snapdragons and GOS has had some pretty nasty things to say about them in the past.

    Samsung is a pipe dream. They'd have no motivation. The entire GOS user base would be a rounding error to them.

    On a global scale, Xiaomi would be a huge get. Not sure I see any of the Chinese OEMs focusing on this though.

    Lenovo and Blackberry...might still exist? I think?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Asus would be nice, I've liked most of the zenphones but either didn't support my carrier/bands or something like that or they stopped allowing bootloader unlocking which is why I didn't think they'd be on the list but this would be a great way to jump back in as an option for enthusiasts.

    Also would love for it to be RAZR, I really want one but also want GrapheneOS but hesitant to buy a pixel.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 22 points 10 months ago

    I wish fairphone could be the thing, but unfortunately - doesn't seem to be the case https://piunikaweb.com/2025/10/13/grapheneos-ending-pixel-exclusivity-new-oem/

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I pray that my Pixel 9 is my last Pixel.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    Could Fairphone count as a "Major" Android OEM ?

    They do use snapdragon chips, are priced roughly the same as the pixels, and might align the most with a project like Graphene and its values ?

    One can dream…

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I hope its blackberry, id love to see them re-enter the market, and i'd love an excuse to buy one.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Fuck! I brought a pixel just for GrapheneOS 2 months ago. Hoping they would continue the support.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Honesty I would just wait it out if I were you. I really regret getting the pixel 9 (since my last phone broke).

    There is nothing new in the pixel 10 the only area that desperately needed improvement was the battery which is just as bad if not worse than the 9 and the modem still sucks. It is not fully bad but because of low reception it fights harder to get signal and therefore burns away the battery even faster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Would love to see oneplus support.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    I guess i know what my next year's phone is gonna be.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    i hope grapheneos keeps supporting pixels, if possible. i liked pixels way before I discovered grapheneos due to the cameras that I still think are on top in the android world, and when I became privacy conscious it was a perfect add on to an already nice phone imo.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Good camera was just a byproduct if better post processing on Google. It was true maybe 5-6 years ago that pixels had too of the line camera. But these days, even Motorola can manage a comparable camera to pixel.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Please let it be Nothing or OnePlus 🙏

  • source
  • [+] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    For my brokes ass I'm just going to keep buying secondhand last-gen pixels, but its good for the overall market to get an expansion in grapheneOS support.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    This needs to happen so bad. Very excited for the future of mobile computing. We are so back.

  • source
  • [+] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    I hope they announce what that new phone is before my Pixel 6 goes EOL

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Finally escaping from Tensor jail. Hopefully the new phone has a decent design.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›