▲ 569 ▼ GrapheneOS is finally ready to break free from Pixels, and it may never look back (www.androidauthority.com) submitted 10 months ago by solrize@lemmy.ml to c/android@lemmy.world 110 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] spacelord@sh.itjust.works 52 points 10 months ago (1 child) Doesn't seem "it's finally ready" when they didn't name the name. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (2 children) Amateur marketing speak for "we're considering bringing it to other hardware"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (1 child) It's not marketing speak because GrapheneOS didn't say it. It's a bad headline from a site known for bad reporting. GrapheneOS has been talking about this for months and there's nothing new in this article that wasn't already out there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) No need to defend it. It was obviously a comment on the headline; I didn't care who wrote it - the criticism was directed at whomever vomited it up. Tech publications are as much uncritical PR agencies for tech companies as the latter's marketroids are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) I was trying to clarify, not defend. It is absolute garbage and this article as a whole is a pile of nothing, written in a weird breathless style like they just discovered something. Thumbs down to this shit all around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago That's fair. 🙂 permalink fedilink source parent [–] spacelord@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago Yep, definitely more in line with that reality. 😄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (2 children) Amateur marketing speak for "we're considering bringing it to other hardware"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (1 child) It's not marketing speak because GrapheneOS didn't say it. It's a bad headline from a site known for bad reporting. GrapheneOS has been talking about this for months and there's nothing new in this article that wasn't already out there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) No need to defend it. It was obviously a comment on the headline; I didn't care who wrote it - the criticism was directed at whomever vomited it up. Tech publications are as much uncritical PR agencies for tech companies as the latter's marketroids are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) I was trying to clarify, not defend. It is absolute garbage and this article as a whole is a pile of nothing, written in a weird breathless style like they just discovered something. Thumbs down to this shit all around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago That's fair. 🙂 permalink fedilink source parent [–] spacelord@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago Yep, definitely more in line with that reality. 😄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (1 child) It's not marketing speak because GrapheneOS didn't say it. It's a bad headline from a site known for bad reporting. GrapheneOS has been talking about this for months and there's nothing new in this article that wasn't already out there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) No need to defend it. It was obviously a comment on the headline; I didn't care who wrote it - the criticism was directed at whomever vomited it up. Tech publications are as much uncritical PR agencies for tech companies as the latter's marketroids are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) I was trying to clarify, not defend. It is absolute garbage and this article as a whole is a pile of nothing, written in a weird breathless style like they just discovered something. Thumbs down to this shit all around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago That's fair. 🙂 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) No need to defend it. It was obviously a comment on the headline; I didn't care who wrote it - the criticism was directed at whomever vomited it up. Tech publications are as much uncritical PR agencies for tech companies as the latter's marketroids are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) I was trying to clarify, not defend. It is absolute garbage and this article as a whole is a pile of nothing, written in a weird breathless style like they just discovered something. Thumbs down to this shit all around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago That's fair. 🙂 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 child) I was trying to clarify, not defend. It is absolute garbage and this article as a whole is a pile of nothing, written in a weird breathless style like they just discovered something. Thumbs down to this shit all around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago That's fair. 🙂 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spacelord@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago Yep, definitely more in line with that reality. 😄 permalink fedilink source parent