top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 63 points 11 months ago (37 children)
load more comments (37 replies)
[–] [S] 31 points 11 months ago* (32 children)

I am totally supporting developers wanting to make money with their product.

But the developer of Photopea has basically built a product for people who want to get rid of Adobe's stupid subscription model and now he tries to force them to pay for his own subscription by breaking the application. That really doesn't sit right with me.

Why would I need to pay 8€/month for image editing features that run in my browser?

It also doesn't help that he went on Github and complained to the developers of uBlock Origin, replying with troll answers like "How can I help you?" but not wanting to accept any other answer than them allowing him to serve ads.

This guy can get rekt, in my humble opinion. I did like the product before this change, though. Does anyone know of similar image editors out there that can batch-crop images in a certain aspect ratio/resolution and then export them to webp? (GIMP is terrible, sorry 🥹)

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago* (8 children)

    I don't really understand why you're using ad-supported proprietary software that you've never paid a dime for (or given a dime to, since you use uBO), claiming that you don't use GIMP or Krita instead because the former "is terrible" and the latter isn't meant for cropping (a trivial, fundamental feature of the software), and then acting entitled to use the Photopea author's own personal work with zero compensation. So you have free alternatives (as in beer and as in freedom), refuse to do even the bare minimum to learn how to use them, and then go full "you took my only food; now I'm gonna starve" when Photopea's author stops you from using their own site/web app for free that they run and maintain at their own expense.

    If anything, you seem entitled and willfully ignorant, and I say that from the perspective of someone who resents digital advertising and proprietary software.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    then acting entitled to use the Photopea author’s own personal work with zero compensation.

    Running batch tasks on the Photopea author’s own infrastructure because Photopea is a website. Lichtmetzger wrote in a reply that he's not using Photopea to edit a photo once in a while and now he's bummed out (I would kinda understand that) but that he's actually processing a big number of images on someone else's resources.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I’m confused what your issue is with the dev. He seems to have posted because uBO was breaking the site for premium users and then got told “just stop monetizing effectively.” Only one reply (don’t use such an obnoxious way to insert the ad sidebar) was actually helpful, though it was at odds with part of his monetization strategy (pay for Premium to get that extra space).

    If uBO devs had said “Sure, give this account premium access and we’ll check it out” and he’d refused, that would be different, but instead they said there was nothing he could do to help them and banned him from participating.

    It also doesn’t seem that he’s intentionally breaking the app when uBO is in use. Rather, uBO breaks the app when ads aren’t being served and he is now detecting when this happens and serving a message about the fact.

    Does anyone know of similar image editors out there that can batch-crop images in a certain aspect ratio/resolution and then export them to webp?

    Not similar, but Image Magick can crop images from the cli and has webp support.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    He's not forcing you into a subscription model, he wants you to either allow ads or go to a subscription model.

    You don't need to pay 8 Euro a month, you just need to allow the ads.

    It's not broken to prevent ad blockers, we all got used to a system that wasn't sustainable, and now we're seeing what is actually required for sites and apps to survive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I think you're taking heat a little bit unfairly. This is, after all, the MILDLY infuriating community, and it can be a hassle when something stops working for you, even if it's perfectly reasonable for it to happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 16 points 11 months ago

    I think you’re taking heat a little bit unfairly.

    Most of it seems to come from one user who seems to hate me in particular. :D But it's fun to start a controversial topic once in a while. At least I'm not getting banned for having a different opinion (which would've definitely happened on Reddit).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago

    The garbage took itself out. I love how that works.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Gimp 3 is awesome now, and 100% free + no ads. Just sayin

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 11 months ago

    What do you mean "now"? Photopea has always been very aggresive towards adblocks.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    are you sure it's not a specific ublock filter or something? i accessed it in librewolf with the default ublock origin settings and it looked fine.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Works fine for me, Firefox and Ublock Origin, DNS by PiHole. I think there's something on your machine causing this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I’ve always ignored Photopea because it’s completely proprietary and the pricing is predatory. I don’t approve of those models, the same reason I won’t touch Adobe.

    I wish Affinity would just release linux versions, but I expect those to get worse now that they are owned by Serif.

    I think your best bet is to buckle down, swallow your pride, and learn Gimp. Yeah, it’s a dumpster fire if you come from a Photoshop background because it isn’t trying to copy Photoshop, it wants to be its own thing. But even though it seems counterintuitive due to your years of existing programming, it is quite powerful.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Krita in Linux has been amazing. I've never used Affinity, and I'm far from a pro... But I can do most of what I used to do in Photoshop in Krita fairly naturally. It's way easier to transition to than GIMP ever was.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Guess I won’t be using photopea anymore

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    "Something is breaking Photopea" ??? Yeah it's yourselves.

    Not sure if this lie is allowed under the EU DSA law.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    So many douchebags in this thread.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Never heard of it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Hol up Photopea's nonfree software?!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›