51
Scientists on Twitter head for the exit (www.axios.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/technology@beehaw.org
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A feud on Twitter highlights the perils of engaging on the platform and a growing tension among researchers and medical professionals.

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 3 years ago (2 children)

They should have been leaving earlier, the outcome was clear by last year. But when I saw recently that Block Party was going away, I knew that it was going to become hellish and untenable.

Let's make them welcome here....

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    yes please, come to the fediverse!

    tied of pulling AI news off twitter already

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It is so damn refreshing seeing what is just "new" instead of what clickbait trained ai is pushing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    I've really enjoyed the lack of guerrilla marketing on Lemmy. But indeed it's great that the platform is not so big that it needs some algorithms to decide what to show, and in doing so attracts all kinds of content optimizers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    Anybody know where they're going? I've seen some in mastodon, some in substack, some just on linkedin...but other than rss there is no easy way to follow a larger crowd of posters from different sources.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    It's all kind of new so nobody knows where the large majority will land until the dust settles. Probably another year or so. But Substack and Mastodon seem to be the most common from what I've seen.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (7 children)

    Wikipedia is also making social platform too, called WT Social. It's not federated unfortunately, but maybe that makes it easier to moderate

    https://wt.social/

    Edit: The beta is here
    https://wts2.wt.social

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    Why do I get a bad feeling about it? I hope wikipedia remains the same after that.

    Besides... they ask so desperately for donations, so it makes me wonder if the project can be sustainable.

    Maybe I'm overthinking stuff, let's see how it goes.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    on Twitter jimmy said that after they sort out their main focus which is some "trust based algorithm" system that I don't really understand, they will add activitypub and all sorts of ways to make it more interconnected.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    Yeah, the trust based algo is how they operate wikipedia. Basically it rates users on their edits and accuracy, Ina very slow and time consuming manner for the mods. But it means that users get "trust ranks" for their contributions and have more power based on their rank.

    Used on a social media platform will be an interesting experiment, especially if it gets federated. Could be good or bad

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments
    view more: next ›