51
Scientists on Twitter head for the exit (www.axios.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/technology@beehaw.org
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A feud on Twitter highlights the perils of engaging on the platform and a growing tension among researchers and medical professionals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (7 children)

Wikipedia is also making social platform too, called WT Social. It's not federated unfortunately, but maybe that makes it easier to moderate

https://wt.social/

Edit: The beta is here
https://wts2.wt.social

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    Why do I get a bad feeling about it? I hope wikipedia remains the same after that.

    Besides... they ask so desperately for donations, so it makes me wonder if the project can be sustainable.

    Maybe I'm overthinking stuff, let's see how it goes.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    on Twitter jimmy said that after they sort out their main focus which is some "trust based algorithm" system that I don't really understand, they will add activitypub and all sorts of ways to make it more interconnected.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    Yeah, the trust based algo is how they operate wikipedia. Basically it rates users on their edits and accuracy, Ina very slow and time consuming manner for the mods. But it means that users get "trust ranks" for their contributions and have more power based on their rank.

    Used on a social media platform will be an interesting experiment, especially if it gets federated. Could be good or bad

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent