A new study published in the journal Sexuality & Culture has found that many adolescents in Spain, including those as young as 12, are not only aware of OnlyFans but also see it as a viable and even empowering way to make money. In group discussions with over 160 teenagers, researchers discovered that platforms promoting erotic content are influencing how young people—especially girls—view economic opportunity, self-worth, and sexuality. Teens frequently framed content creation as a personal choice or expression of agency, while minimizing the risks.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 80 points 1 year ago (25 children)

"People as young as 12 have realistic views of the economic viability of sexuality, how dare they."

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Somehow I doubt that. More likely they view it like being a YouTuber, streamer, or influencer, when in reality it's primarily video production and marketing. It's not just "film titties get money", you have to actually convince people to subscribe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago

    It is like being a YouTuber. People think it's easy money and then they make jack-shit with barely any audience all while working their ass off. Only a few get big, most burn out after lots of work and little success.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    I think that the larger problem is that you probably aren't going to be an erotic actress for your whole life.

    Like, what the authors seem to be focusing on is the degree to which teens might see this as an alternative to traditional work or being educated:

    Another important finding was how strongly OnlyFans was associated with financial success. Teens repeatedly cited the platform as an easier and more appealing alternative to traditional work or education.

    So, okay. Say you're a young woman and 20, and you make pretty good money putting on cat ears and licking a microphone or whatever's presently in vogue compared to most other things you could be doing at that age. But...are you going to be doing that at 30? 40? 50? Are you likely to make enough to retire off that in the time that you're successfully doing that? Because if you haven't acquired a skillset in that period for a lifelong career...like, if you forego education for that, that could be a really expensive exchange.

    Now, in fairness, I kind of feel like some similar issues also apply to things like being a professional sports player. Short viable career for most sports, high risk of not being able to make it big enough to retire off earnings. But we also haven't had a radical recent shift in the pro sports industry.

    I guess maybe pro gamers could be in a similar position. I don't know how many teens plan to do that (though I haven't seen a lot of material agonising about the number of teens who want to become pro gamers). I have seen a lot of material concerned about the wildly-beyond-what-can-be-sustained numbers who want to become social media influencers, though.

    EDIT: Regarding influencers:

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/social-media-influencers-86-of-young-americans-want-to-become-one/

    86% of young Americans want to become a social media influencer

    I can't give you a percentage of society that can be viably dedicated to trying to influence others on social media off the cuff, but I am very confident that it is far, far less than that. If anything remotely approaching that level tries to do the field full time and make major tradeoffs for it, that's going to potentially be very costly for society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    There's not really any stigma to being a former sports star, that's one big difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I mean, I can imagine a world where there isn't to being a former erotic actress either. Used to be a stigma attached to being a (non-erotic) actor or actress, whereas today, we have very high-prestige actors.

    But that world still requires people to have a skillset for their working life


    like, that's kinda fundamental.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I can imagine it too, but that's not the world we live in, and I don't think we will any time soon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Well, it's hard to predict societal change, I think. I remember commenting that a lot of past futurism seemed to be a lot more accurate on technical change than it was on social change. Gender roles or clothing predictions aren't all that great, though what machines are doing can be at least in the ballpark. So I feel kind of on thin ice here.

    But if you look at the article, the stigma doesn't seem to be showing up with the study participants:

    Others expressed admiration for girls who made money through OnlyFans, seeing them as smart or independent. This normalization of sexualized self-presentation—and the lack of critical reflection on its long-term consequences—worried the researchers, who warned that it reflects a broader cultural shift toward viewing intimacy and the body as tools for profit.

    If you look at what a lot of musicians do today in music videos, I'd say that it's not terribly far off softcore pornography. I've certainly seen softcore pornography in the past that was less-explicit than what a mainstream musician might be doing in music videos in 2025.

    And I think that that's a shift that's been happening for a long time. Selling sexuality was part of what Michael Jackson did in the 1990s or Elvis did in the 1960s.

    So my guess is that the trajectory is towards normalization. Can't say with any certainty that the trajectory will continue, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    I don't think you can extrapolate that from this. Recognizing economic hardship and understanding nuanced sexual dynamics in society are very different.

    It would be like saying a child understands the military industrial complex and systematic oppression just because they liked GI Joe action figures or want to be in the army. Lots of kids just think helicopters and explosions are cool. Then their opinions change as they get older and begin to understand the actual toll on human life that a war takes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    This is an insane fucking take. Yes 12 year olds should not be feeling a desire to make pornography.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    It doesn't say they desire to make it, but that they recognise it's a viable way to make a living, which is true. I think this says more about how terrible wage slavery is and how difficult it is to survive on minimum wage, than anything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "Pornography" on OF is... a wide term, if we're being honest.

    There are a TON of creators there that pretty much just make noise against a microphone, with their fingers, and that's it (ASMR). They may (Or may not) do it in skimpy clothing.

    That being said, should 12 year olds be feeling a desire to be a soldier when they grow up? A construction worker? Or, any other line of work where you literally sell your body + useful years of your life doing back breaking work that leaves you on pain meds after the age of 45?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 50 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In all fairness, you don't have to spend very long working in retail to feel like sex work not only probably pays much better, but is also probably a lot less degrading.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago*

    100% this. I've been sexually assaulted, spat at, threatened with the police, had a snake pulled on me (???). None of these things happen to you on only fans ( I guess you might have another kind of snake pulled on you eyyy) and you'd make significantly more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    “Teens as young as 12“

    Im pretty sure that's now how teens work...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    The solution is, of course, more censorship.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    That tells a lot about the job market.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Somebody start monitoring GOP members for trips to Spain

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I mean, oldest profession and all that. Shouldn’t be surprising. When you can just fill mason jars with tap water and let the imaginations of some horny others do the rest, what’s not to like?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm a 32 year old man with a receeding hairline. I too see OnlyFans as an appealing alternative to traditional work. Unfortunately no one else wants to see that.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Don't like 90% of onlyfan people make next to nothing? I thought only a small portion of them can actually afford to do it "full time".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, same thing with cam girls. A few popular ones can make a lot of money, but it's pretty common to see rooms that are mostly empty with a bored girl waiting for tips and slowly getting more and more discouraged.

    There's so much free porn on the internet. Including theirs, because there's always people recording and wanting their own clout or money from sharing it. Though one plus side is due to the sheer volume of what's available, the "once it's on the internet, it never leaves" doesn't always apply. And even that which stays can be hard for anyone else to find due to the noise.

    Though those who advertise their OF also advertise the search string to find it for free.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    The children yearn for the.. yikes.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Fascists: Omg, young people see online sex-work as a possible solution to their future bondage under capitalism!

    Me: Change the system so that they can have a future otherwise.

    Fascists: We're more interested in overreacting.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 1 year ago
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Articles like this showcase a weird 180 in moral logic over the last century.

    On one hand, it is now stigmatized for younger people to have sex. Age of consent went up and 12 year olds are not allowed to do OnlyFans because it is harmful for them.

    On the other hand sex and sex work is promoted as non harmful and a fun innocent activiy.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    My ex saw onlyfans as a great way to make a living and express her sexuality after we broke up.

    It did not go as well as she thought it would.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    In person sex work might be safe from AI, only fans probably not.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sorry, kids. Porn is another line of work that's going to dwindle away, thanks to AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Do any of y'all pay for OnlyFans?

    Like, I am single and horny/lonely, but… I don’t get it, even theoretically. What’s the appeal of viewing some performer through a one-way digital window over the deluge of free content?

    And I get that some would be into that, but (apparently) a significant fraction of the planet? That I don't understand.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›