top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 131 points 1 year ago (64 children)

85% of Canadians live within 100 miles of the American border. And yous claim you don't want to be part of them.

*(runs and hides)*

  • source
  • hideshow 64 child comments
  • [–] 108 points 1 year ago (16 children)
  • [–] 90 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yes, but instead of guarding against white walkers from the north it’s pedos from the south.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (39 children)

    If anything, this proves how much Canadians don't want to be Americans.

    Canadian weather is shitty, you can't grow crops for most of the year. During the fraction of the year where the climate is suitable for growing crops, the variety of things that grow is small compared to what's possible in the US. And, as bad as winter can be, summer's no good either. You don't want to be outside in the winter because it's -30, and you don't want to be outside in the summer because it's +35. The cost of living in Canada is high because you need to heat your home in the winter and cool it in the summer. Almost everybody drives a car because of that "being outside sucks" thing, but cars are expensive to own and operate in Canada. There's the cost of winter tires, more expensive winter fuels, antifreeze in the windshield washer, plus the constant freeze/thaw cycle wrecks the road surfaces, which results in potholes, which results in more wear and tear on cars. In addition, to make driving safe they drop a lot of salt and sand, which just rusts your car. Because the country is a thin strip, everything is far away, and everything communications-related is expensive. And, a low population relative to the US means that a lot of companies just don't offer services in Canada because it isn't worth it to comply with Canadian laws just to get the same number of customers you could get from a single American state. I could keep going on and on.

    Yet, despite all that, Canadians huddle up as close as possible to the border for warmth, but refuse to go any further south because that would mean entering the US. As bad as Canada's climate is, putting up with that is an easy decision to make when the alternative is 'Murica.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

    One minor correction. The reason Canadians drive is not because the weather sucks, Canadians drive so much because our country refuses to build real transit or walkability. Hell half our country is going to court because a few of our provincial premiers want building bike lanes to be illegal. There are other countries with similar climates to Canada where people don't need to extensively rely on their car to live their daily life.

    Id also say that the biggest factor to cost of living is cost of housing, which is largely related to our cities making it nearly impossible to build any housing that isnt detached single family homes with minimum lot sizes and set back requirements. This also reinforces the car dependancy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Seriously, half the fucking country lives in the Québec City - Windsor corridor and we don't even have a high speed train there?? It's a political issue, not a geographical one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
  • load more comments (21 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (27 children)

    America isn't any better. Depending on what statistic you are looking at, 40% to 75% of all Americans live within 100 miles of the border

    Not so fun fact: if American border patrol agents stop you within the 100 mile zone, they can ignore parts of the fourth amendment and perform what would normally be illegal search and seizure

    100 Mile Zone

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    can ice do more shit in the 100 mile zone or nah?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Yes and it includes 'within 100 miles of an airport'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 66 points 1 year ago (5 children)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 41 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Ayyyy one of the 15% that doesn't live near the border checking in 😎

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No one lives in the Maritimes and Newfies are a figment of our imagination?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    The implication of that map is skewed hard though. It's only cause of Montreal, Toronto, S & SW ontario and Vancouver. 3 small spots compared to the size of the border, with 90% of the border population.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    John Candy tried to warn us. They're preparing for an invasion!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Fun Fact, a lot of North Dakotans live higher north than half of Canadians.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    If I understand correctly based on a map and Wikipedia, the concept of "a lot of people" does not exist in North Dakota, though.

    I had never heard of the city of Bismarck, their state capital of more than 70 thousand inhabitants, a bit over 10% of the state's population. But, now I do. I also had not thought there can be a state capital with that little population. (And then this made me curious and I learned that in Germany the smallest state capital is Schwerin, in the state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, and it has about 98 000 inhabitants in a state of 1½ million inhabitants.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    We have, it's called Winnipeg. Also I love how it stops in the before the Quebec border.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's because the rest is all degens from upcountry.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    There's plenty of room for activities! Like... sledding.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    Legitimate question: what may be the actual reason for this concentration? Is it weather? Natural resources? Is it political? On a related note: what is the reason that Canada as a whole has so few people? It is still mindblowing for me that the entire country has less people than each of the world's top 3 metropolitan areas

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    the rest is on fire. burning for decades. wind shifted of late

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    In B.C.'s defense, imo, most of the land to its North is either too mountainous ^[1][2.1]^ or has too harsh a climate ^[2.2]^ to be realistically inhabitable. I think it's also worth noting that 15.4% of B.C.'s lands are protected ^[3]^.

    ::: spoiler References

    1. Type: Document (PDF). Title: "BC Fact Sheet". Publisher: "Super, Natural British Columbia". Accessed: 2025-08-09T04:10Z. URI: https://www.hellobc.com/content/uploads/2019/04/TM_BCFactSheet.pdf.
      • Type: Text. Location: [§"The Land". ¶2]

        Ten mountain ranges push west from the Canadian Rockies in the east to the Coast Mountains and the Vancouver Island Ranges in the west, and ancient temperate rainforests hug the coast. In between are rolling grasslands, lush valleys, tens of thousands of lakes, glacier-fed rivers, and even semi-arid desert. Mountains cover 75% of the province.

    2. Type: Article. Title: "British Columbia". Publisher: "Wikipedia". Published: 2025-08-08T03:18Z. Accessed: 2025-08-09T05:48Z. URI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia.
      1. Type: Image. Filename: "BC_Elevation.svg". Author: "Awmcphee". Published: 2024-04-27. Location: §"Geography". URI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BC_Elevation.svg.

        .

      2. Type: Image. Filename: "British_Columbia_Köppen.svg". Author: "Adam Peterson". Published: 2016-08-12. Location: [§"Geography"§"Climate"]. URI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:British_Columbia_K%C3%B6ppen.svg.

    3. Type: Article. Title: "Protected Lands & Waters in B.C.". Publisher: ["Environmental Reporting BC". "Ministry of Environment". "British Columbia".]. Published: 2016-06. Accessed: 2025-08-09T05:59Z. URI: https://www.env.gov.bc.ca/soe/indicators/land/protected-lands-and-waters.html.
      • Type: Text. Location: ¶1.

        […] Protected lands and waters cover 15.4% of B.C.'s land base and 3.2% of B.C.'s marine areas. […]

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›